Difference between revisions of "Portosystemic Shunt"

From WikiVet English
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 71: Line 71:
*Ettinger, S.J. and Feldman, E. C. (2000) '''Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine Diseases of the Dog and Cat Volume 2''' (Fifth Edition) ''W.B. Saunders Company''.
*Ettinger, S.J. and Feldman, E. C. (2000) '''Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine Diseases of the Dog and Cat Volume 2''' (Fifth Edition) ''W.B. Saunders Company''.
*Nelson, R.W. and Couto, C.G. (2009) '''Small Animal Internal Medicine (Fourth Edition)''' ''Mosby Elsevier''.
*Nelson, R.W. and Couto, C.G. (2009) '''Small Animal Internal Medicine (Fourth Edition)''' ''Mosby Elsevier''.
*Watson, P. (1997) '''Decision making in the management of portosystemic shunts''' ''In Practice'' 19;106 - 120

Revision as of 10:05, 22 August 2009

Category:WikiClinical CanineCow
Category:WikiClinical FelineCow
Category:WikiClinical EquineCow
Category:WikiClinical BovineCow
Category:WikiClinical PorcineCow


  • Relatively common in dog, especially small breed dogs
  • Purebred dogs are more at risk
  • Occasionally seen in cats, horses, cows and pigs


Portosystemic shunts (PSS) are anomalous vascular connections between the portal and systemic venous systems. This allows for some portal blood draining from the stomach, intestines, pancreas and spleen to bypass the liver and drains directly into the systemic circulation. PSS may be congenital or acquired secondary to portal hypertension.

Congenital PSS occurs in approximately 70% of PSS in dogs and majority of PSS in cats. It commonly present as a single, or at most double, extrahepatic or intrahepatic anomalous vessel. Extrahepatic PSS accounts for 63% of single shunts in dog and is more commonly found in miniature and toy-breed dogs. Intrahepatic shunts are usually left-sided, resulting from persistent foetal ductus venosus, and more common in large breed dogs. Right-sided or central intrahepatic shunts are recognised and these may have a different embryological origin.

Acquired PSS occurs in approximately 20% of PSS and often consists of multiple shunts. They arise due to portal hypertension, following an increased resistance to portal blood flow. This leads to opening of some of the numerous normal, non-functional microvascular communications. Underlying causes of portal hypertension included acute fulminant hepatitis, hepatic fibrosis, hepatic neoplasia, portal vein thrombosis, hepatic arteriovenous fistulae and congenital hypoplasia of the portal vein.

The pathophysiology of PSS relates to the shunting of blood directly from the systemic circulation, resulting in hyperammonaemia and Hepatic Encephalopathy.


Clinical Signs

  • Young animals, usually under 1 years of ages, but can sometimes be up to 10 years or older
  • Failure to thrive, small body stature or weight loss
  • Waxing and waning neurological signs due to hepatic encephalopathy. These are usually most severe an hour or two post prandial but this may not be obvious in all cases
  • Ptyalism in cats
  • Dysuria, stranguria, haematuria, pollakiuria and urethral obstruction
    • An increase in ammonium concentration in the blood decreases the ability of enzymes to convert uric acid to allantoin, thereby resulting in urate urolithiasis.
  • Intermittent vomiting or diarrhoea

Laboratory Tests


  • Microcytosis


  • Decreased blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
  • Hypoalbuminaemia
  • Hypocholesterolaemia
  • Hypoglycaemia

Other Tests

  • Increased postprandial ± preprandial bile acids
  • Increased ammonia levels

Diagnostic Imaging

A definitive diagnosis relies on visualisation of the shunting blood vessel. This may be done with either ultrasonography or contrast portography or at surgery.


  • Surgical ligation of the anomalous vessels
    • Portal hypertension is possible post ligation. For this reason, a partial ligation is performed initally, followed by a complete ligation a few months later.
  • Medical treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy


Excellent prognosis in dog for resolution of clinical signs after total surgical ligation. However, the response of cat to surgical intervention in cats is less promising than in dogs.


  • Ettinger, S.J. and Feldman, E. C. (2000) Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine Diseases of the Dog and Cat Volume 2 (Fifth Edition) W.B. Saunders Company.
  • Nelson, R.W. and Couto, C.G. (2009) Small Animal Internal Medicine (Fourth Edition) Mosby Elsevier.
  • Watson, P. (1997) Decision making in the management of portosystemic shunts In Practice 19;106 - 120