Line 29: Line 29:     
Arguments against GM foods is that a GM strain may be used to such an extent that it limits biological diversity, causing a loss of the genetic material contained in lost & unused non-GM organisms, potentially compromising food security. Furthermore, if the GM strains are provided by a few multinational companies it could lead to an undesirable dependancy on these companies. Other issues are potential antimicrobial resistance arising through certain manufacturing conditions used in the creation some GM organisms. Also concern exists about the development of resistance to insecticides & herbicides produced by some GM organisms.
 
Arguments against GM foods is that a GM strain may be used to such an extent that it limits biological diversity, causing a loss of the genetic material contained in lost & unused non-GM organisms, potentially compromising food security. Furthermore, if the GM strains are provided by a few multinational companies it could lead to an undesirable dependancy on these companies. Other issues are potential antimicrobial resistance arising through certain manufacturing conditions used in the creation some GM organisms. Also concern exists about the development of resistance to insecticides & herbicides produced by some GM organisms.
 +
 +
Countering this, the use of GM foods could lead to increased production & reduced costs along with better [[organoleptic]] properties.
 +
 +
The use of GM organisms is more accepted in medical biotechnology than food production.
    
=[[References - WikiVPH|References]]=
 
=[[References - WikiVPH|References]]=
208

edits