Line 59: |
Line 59: |
| ==Prevention== | | ==Prevention== |
| | | |
− | Faecal tapeworm ELISA test: senstivity 70%, specificity 95%(40).
| + | *Adequate and appropriate feeding of good quality forage |
− | Identification of infected animals based upon detection of eggs in feces is labor intensive and unreliable. This study involved the development of a test for A.perfoliata coproantigen using an antigen capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and correctly distinguished between infected and uninfected animals in a trial with a small sample size.(Kania)
| + | *Avoidance of sudden dietary changes |
| + | *An adequate tapeworm control programme |
| + | |
| + | Faceal worm egg counts do not reliably detect horses infected with ''A.perfoliata'' and a coproantigen capture ELISA also demonstrates poor sensitivity (Kania). A serological ELISA has been developed which has a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 95%(40) |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |