Difference between revisions of "Ileal Impaction - Horse"
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
==Prognosis== | ==Prognosis== | ||
| − | The prognosis for survival is generally good.<ref name="Hanson">Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. ''Vet Surg'', 27(6):555-60.</ref><ref name="Hanson 2">Hanson, R.R, Schumacher, J, Humburg, J, Dunkerkley, S.C (1996) Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990-1994). ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 208(6):898-900.</ref> The shorter the duration of colic before surgical intervention, the better the prognosis.<ref>Embertson, R.M, Colahan, P.T, Brown, M.P, Peyton, L.C, Schneider, R.K, Granstedt, M.E (1985) Ileal impaction in the horse. ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 186(6):570-2.</ref> The requirement for enterotomy, enterectomy, jejunocecostomy during surgery(Parks) and the development of postoperative adhesions have been associated with a poorer prognosis for survival.<ref name="Baxter">Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. ''Vet Surg'', 18(6):409-14.</ref> | + | The prognosis for survival is generally good.<ref name="Hanson">Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. ''Vet Surg'', 27(6):555-60.</ref><ref name="Hanson 2">Hanson, R.R, Schumacher, J, Humburg, J, Dunkerkley, S.C (1996) Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990-1994). ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 208(6):898-900.</ref> The shorter the duration of colic before surgical intervention, the better the prognosis.<ref>Embertson, R.M, Colahan, P.T, Brown, M.P, Peyton, L.C, Schneider, R.K, Granstedt, M.E (1985) Ileal impaction in the horse. ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 186(6):570-2.</ref> The requirement for enterotomy, enterectomy, jejunocecostomy during surgery(Parks) and the development of postoperative adhesions have all been associated with a poorer prognosis for survival.<ref name="Baxter">Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. ''Vet Surg'', 18(6):409-14.</ref> |
==Prevention== | ==Prevention== | ||
Revision as of 12:59, 8 August 2010
 |
This article is still under construction. |
| Also known as: | Colic Impaction |
Description
The most common condition causing simple obstruction of the small intestinal lumen.[1]
Signalment
Adult horses
Prevalence
Ileal impaction occurs most frequently in the southeastern USA, Germany and The Netherlands.[1] In the southeastern USA, there appears to be an increased prevalence in the autumn which may relate to changing weather and feedng regimes at that time of year.[2]
Aetiology
In the southeastern United States, feeding of poor quality coastal Bermuda hay and lack of administration of the anthelmintic pyrantel pamoate have been implicated as risk factors.[3] It is proposed that when this forage has a high fibre content, there is an increased proportion of thin fibres which are prematurely swallowed.(Bliks) Sudden feed changes may also contribute.[4] In the UK, infection with the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata is an important risk factor. Proudman and colleagues (1998) found that more than 80% of ileal impactions were associated with serological or faecal evidence of tapeworm infection.[5] Anoplocephala perfoliata infects up to 60% of horses in some geographical areas and has also been implicated as a risk factor for bowel irritation and spasmodic colic.[6]Impaction may also develop secondary to spastic contractions of the ileal musculature against ingesta.[1]
Clinical Signs
Typical signs associated with small intestinal obstruction:
- Moderate to severe colic
- Reduced borborygmi
- Tachycardia
- Nasogastric reflux may take a considerable time to develop because the ileum is the distal-most part of the small intestine.
Diagnosis
Early rectal examination may reveal the impaction low in the right caudal abdominal quadrant. Subsequent distention of the jejunum will be palpable per rectum but may preclude palpation of the impaction, thus the definitive diagnosis is often made at surgery. Many horses with ileal impaction are delayed in their referral because initially their colic is mild and their condition deceptively stable. Abdominocentesis may show an elevated protein concentration if the impaction has persisted for more than about 18 hours.[1] The most likely differential diagnosis is proximal jejunitis, which can be challenging to rule out.
Treatment
Medical treatment with fluids and liquid paraffin may resolve the impaction early on(36) but surgery is typically required. At surgery, fluids such as saline or carboxymethylcellulose can be directly infused into the mass so that the impaction can be manually broken down and massaged into the caecum. Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) may be included in the infusion to help disrupt the mass. An enterotomy in the distal jejunum should be considered to evacuate impacted contents and reduce intestinal manipulation.Theileal impaction was reduced by extraluminal massage aided by admixing of intestinal fluid oral to the impaction or injection of fluids intraluminally and then movement of the ingesta into the cecum. One horse initially treated by manual reduction required jejunocecostomy twice for management of recurrent ileal impaction.Ileal impactions can be successfully reduced by celiotomy and extraluminal massage and injection techniques to soften the ingesta for passage into the cecum without enterotomy or bypass techniques in most horses. (Hanson)
Treatment consisted of intravenous administration of a balanced electrolyte solution, nasogastric intubation and siphonage, and administration of analgesics. Mineral oil was administered after gastric reflux had ceased. Mean time for resolution of ileal impaction was 11.7 hours. Medical treatment may be a viable alternative for horses that cannot have surgery,provided persistent signs of severe pain or progressive gaseous distention ofthe small intestine are not features of the condition. Improvement ofcardiovascular status, reduction in signs of abdominal pain, decrease in distentionof loops of small intestine during repeated transrectal examination, softeningof the impaction, and decreases in amounts of gastric reflux were indicative ofa response to medical treatment.(Hanson Schumacher)
Reflux is found in 50% of horses requiring surgical conrrection for ileal impaction(35,41)
Complications
Small intestinal distension and manipulation of the ileum at surgery may lead to post-operative ileus[7] but the risk is reduced if the duration between disease onset and surgical intervention is decreased.[2] Depending on the degree of damage to the serosal surface of the small intestine at surgery, complications may develop several weeks after surgery due to intra-abdominal adhesions.[1] Most of the problems related to adhesions are thought to occur within 2 months.[8]
Prognosis
The prognosis for survival is generally good.[2][9] The shorter the duration of colic before surgical intervention, the better the prognosis.[10] The requirement for enterotomy, enterectomy, jejunocecostomy during surgery(Parks) and the development of postoperative adhesions have all been associated with a poorer prognosis for survival.[8]
Prevention
Faecal tapeworm ELISA test: senstivity 70%, specificity 95%(40). Identification of infected animals based upon detection of eggs in feces is labor intensive and unreliable. This study involved the development of a test for A.perfoliata coproantigen using an antigen capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and correctly distinguished between infected and uninfected animals in a trial with a small sample size.(Kania)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Merck & Co (2008) The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition), Merial.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. Vet Surg, 27(6):555-60. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "Hanson" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>tag; name "Hanson" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Little, D, Blikslager, A.T (2002) Factors associated with development of ileal impaction in horses with surgical colic:78 cases (1986-2000). Equine Vet J 34(5):464-8.
- ↑ Parks, A.H.A, Allen, D (1998) The purported role of coastal Bermuda hay in the etiology of ileal impactions: results of a questionnaire (abstract), 6th Equine Colic Research Symposium, University of Georgia, p37. In:
- ↑ Proudman, C.J, French, N.P, Trees, A.J (1998) Tapeworm infection is a significant risk factor for spasmodic colic and ileal impaction colic in the horse. Equine Vet J, 30:194-199.
- ↑ Kania, S.A, Reinemeyer, C.R (2005) Anoplocephala perfoliata coproantigen detection: a preliminary study. Vet Parasitol, 127(2):115-9.
- ↑ Blikslager, A.T, Bowman, K.F, Levine, J.F, et al. (1994) Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative ileus in horses: 31 cases (1990-1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 205:1748-1752.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. Vet Surg, 18(6):409-14.
- ↑ Hanson, R.R, Schumacher, J, Humburg, J, Dunkerkley, S.C (1996) Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 208(6):898-900.
- ↑ Embertson, R.M, Colahan, P.T, Brown, M.P, Peyton, L.C, Schneider, R.K, Granstedt, M.E (1985) Ileal impaction in the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 186(6):570-2.