Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 110: Line 110:     
==Diagnosis==
 
==Diagnosis==
Presumptive on clinical signs and response to treatment (Sanchez)
+
A presumptive diagnosis can be based on clinical signs and response to therapy,<ref name="Sanchez">Sanchez, L.C (2010) 'Diseases Of The Stomach' in  Reed, S.M, Bayly, W.M. and Sellon, D.C (2010) '''Equine Internal Medicine''' (Third Edition), Saunders, Chapter 15.</ref> however, a definitive diagnosis requires visualisation of the stomach. This can be achieved in the live horse using endsocopy or, alternatively, at post-mortem.(Nadeau 2009)
Definitive diagnosis requires endoscopy (cannot do in foals as need to starve prior to exam)
  −
''EGUS was recently discussed at the 2010 Annual meeting between the Equine Insurers Forum (EIF) and the British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA). The EIF maintained that in order to support claims for the long term costs associated with treatment of EGUS, there would be a requirement for veterinary surgeons to make a definitive diagnosis prior to prescribing omeprazole.(BEVA)''
  −
 
  −
Diagnosis
  −
The definitive diagnosis of EGUS can only be made after visualisation of the stomach either ante mortem using a 2.5–3.0 m endoscope and utilising an established scoring system (Tables 1 and
  −
2) or scoring system designed by investigators or at post mortem. However, if an endoscope of sufficient length is not available, clinical signs (rough hair coat, partial anorexia, mild weight loss, mild abdominal pain and poor performance) and response to treatment can be used in horses suspected of having EGUS. This is a conundrum because clinical signs are often vague and can lead to a subtle decrease performance. After ruling out other causes, alleviation of clinical signs and/or improvement in performance after treatment may suggest the diagnosis of EGUS (Anon 1999).
  −
Other diagnostic methods include measuring urine and plasma sucrose concentration (sucrose permeability tests) (O’Conner et al. 2004; Hewetson et al. 2006). However, methods for measuring sucrose require sophisticated analysis equipment, which may not be practical for clinicians in the field.
  −
(Nadeau 2009)
  −
 
  −
The presumptive diagnosis of EGUS is based typically on nonspecific clinical signs and response to therapy.(EGUC)
      +
''EGUS was recently discussed at the 2010 Annual meeting between the Equine Insurers Forum (EIF) and the British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA).  The EIF maintained that in order to support claims for the long term costs associated with treatment of EGUS, there would be a requirement for veterinary surgeons to make a definitive diagnosis prior to prescribing omeprazole.(BEVA)''
    
===Endoscopy===
 
===Endoscopy===
 +
(cannot do in foals as need to starve prior to exam)
   −
Endoscopic evaluation
+
ante mortem using a 2.5–3.0 m endoscope and utilising an established scoring system (Nadeau 2009)
Endoscopy (Fig 1) is currently the only reliable method for confirming a diagnosis of EGUS. Endoscopic equipment can be grouped into 2 categories: fibreoptic and video.
+
 +
Endoscopic equipment can be grouped into 2 categories: fibreoptic and video.
 
Flexible endoscopes: for mature equine gastric endoscopy, a minimum working length of 200 cm is required. However, a 280-300 cm long endoscope is required to perform duodenoscopy in mature individuals. A working length of 110 cm with an outer diameter of 10 mm (human gastroscope) is sufficient to reach the stomach of foals up to age 30-40 days.
 
Flexible endoscopes: for mature equine gastric endoscopy, a minimum working length of 200 cm is required. However, a 280-300 cm long endoscope is required to perform duodenoscopy in mature individuals. A working length of 110 cm with an outer diameter of 10 mm (human gastroscope) is sufficient to reach the stomach of foals up to age 30-40 days.
 
Fibreoptic endoscopic equipment uses glass-fibre bundles to transmit light to the area to be viewed and transmit this image to an eyepiece. The image is magnified by a lens system within the eyepiece. This is important in alimentary endoscopy, since 150 W lamps used in most portable light sources provide poor illumination of a horse’s stomach. More powerful light sources are available (up to 300 W) but become larger and less portable as the lamp intensity increases. The quality of the fibreoptic instrument is determined largely by its image resolution, which is related directly to the number of optical fibres.
 
Fibreoptic endoscopic equipment uses glass-fibre bundles to transmit light to the area to be viewed and transmit this image to an eyepiece. The image is magnified by a lens system within the eyepiece. This is important in alimentary endoscopy, since 150 W lamps used in most portable light sources provide poor illumination of a horse’s stomach. More powerful light sources are available (up to 300 W) but become larger and less portable as the lamp intensity increases. The quality of the fibreoptic instrument is determined largely by its image resolution, which is related directly to the number of optical fibres.
 
Videoendoscopic systems use glass-fibre bundles to transmit light, but use a charge-coupled device (CCD) chip to transmit the image. Generation of the light source (300 W) and processing of the CCD-generated electronic signal occurs in the endoscope’s processor.  
 
Videoendoscopic systems use glass-fibre bundles to transmit light, but use a charge-coupled device (CCD) chip to transmit the image. Generation of the light source (300 W) and processing of the CCD-generated electronic signal occurs in the endoscope’s processor.  
Assessment of severity
  −
The EGUS Council has adopted a lesion grading system that:
  −
Is simple and straightforward
  −
Can be applied to the squamous and glandular mucosal linings of the equine stomach
  −
0Can be used by individual practitioners and researchers
  −
Is similar to other grading systems used to characterise clinical severity of other body, systems (e.g. lameness,
  −
neurological disorders, heart murmurs).
  −
Lesion grading system
  −
Grade 0 The epithelium is intact (Fig 2) and there is no appearance of hyperaemia (reddening) or hyperkeratosis (yellow appearance to the squamous mucosa)
  −
Grade 1 The mucosa is intact, but there are areas of reddening or hyperkeratosis (squamous)
  −
Grade 2 Small, single, or multifocal lesions
  −
Grade 3 Large, single, or multifocal lesions or extensive superficial lesions
  −
Grade4 Extensive lesions with areas of apparent deep ulceration.
  −
Note that no mention of bleeding is made in assigning lesion grades, because bleeding does not determine lesion severity. Small superficial erosions (Fig 3) may bleed, whereas deep ulcers may not have active haemorrhage at the time of endoscopic examination.(EGUC)
  −
  −
The endoscopist may underestimate the n u m b e r of gastric ulcers and may not be able accurately to p redict the severity or depth of those ulcers present in the n o n g l a n d u l a r equine stomach. Furt h e r m o re, the endoscopist may miss glandular gastric ulcers. (Andrews 2002)
  −
  −
Squamous ulceration was scored by means of a grading scale from 0 to 3, according to Andrews and Nadeau (1999), as follows.
  −
0 Intact mucosal epithelium (mild reddening and or mild hyperkeratosis),
  −
1 Small single or small multifocal lesions,
  −
2 Large single or large multifocal lesions or extensive superficial lesions, 3 Extensive (often coalescing) lesions with areas of apparent deep ulceration.(Prevelance)
        Line 156: Line 128:  
Oesophagogastroscopy may be performed at the facility where the horse is normally housed. The horse must be held off feed for 6-8 h before oesophagogastroscopy to allow time for the stomach to empty and permit visualisation of the mucosa. The procedure is usually performed approximately 5 min after i.v. sedation with xylazine (Rompun), 0.6-0.8 mgkg bwt. (Orsini)
 
Oesophagogastroscopy may be performed at the facility where the horse is normally housed. The horse must be held off feed for 6-8 h before oesophagogastroscopy to allow time for the stomach to empty and permit visualisation of the mucosa. The procedure is usually performed approximately 5 min after i.v. sedation with xylazine (Rompun), 0.6-0.8 mgkg bwt. (Orsini)
   −
Minimum endoscope length of two metres and 2.8-3.0 metre instruments are required for duodenoscopy A 3 metre endoscope allows visualization of stomach, pylorus and proximal duodenum (Sanchez) Shorter scopes permit investigation of gastric body and fundus only (Sanchez) Maximum external diameter of 9mm for neonates (Sanchez) Foals - lesions mainly in glandular epithelium Adults - margo plicatus and squamous epithelium  
+
Minimum endoscope length of two metres and 2.8-3.0 metre instruments are required for duodenoscopy
 
+
A 3 mtre endoscope allows visualization of stomach, pyrlorus and proximal duodenum (Sanchez)
 +
Shorter scopes permit investigation fo gastric body and fundus only (Sanchez)
 +
Maximum external diameter of 9mm for neonates (Sanchez)
 +
Foals - lesions mainly in glandular epithelium
 +
Adults - margo plicatus and squamous epithelium
    
Performed under mild sedation in standing horse or foal (Sanchez)
 
Performed under mild sedation in standing horse or foal (Sanchez)
 
Duodenoscopy is most specific diagnostic method but is technically me chanllenegng than gastrocopy
 
Duodenoscopy is most specific diagnostic method but is technically me chanllenegng than gastrocopy
 
EGUS Lesion Scoring System publsihed based on consens by Equine Gastric Ulcer Council(2 in Sanchez)
 
EGUS Lesion Scoring System publsihed based on consens by Equine Gastric Ulcer Council(2 in Sanchez)
 +
The EGUS Council has adopted a lesion grading system that:
 +
Is simple and straightforward
 +
Can be applied to the squamous and glandular mucosal linings of the equine stomach
    +
Note that no mention of bleeding is made in assigning lesion grades, because bleeding does not determine lesion severity. Small superficial erosions (Fig 3) may bleed, whereas deep ulcers may not have active haemorrhage at the time of endoscopic examination.(EGUC)
      Line 170: Line 150:  
|-
 
|-
 
|Grade 0
 
|Grade 0
|Intact epithelium with no appearance of hyperaemia or hyperkeratosis
+
|Intact epithelium with no appearance of hyperaemia (reddening) or hyperkeratosis (yellowing of the squamous mucosa)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Grade 1
 
|Grade 1
Line 184: Line 164:  
|Extensive lesions with areas of deep ulceration
 
|Extensive lesions with areas of deep ulceration
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
While these systems are useful for assessing the extent of disease and monitoring response to treatment, little work has been done to correlate gross observations with the histological picture. Lesions that appear alike grossly and receive similar numerical scores may have dissimilar histological appearances and underlying pathogeneses.(Martineau 2009)
 +
The endoscopist may underestimate the n u m b e r of gastric ulcers and may not be able accurately to p redict the severity or depth of those ulcers present in the n o n g l a n d u l a r equine stomach. Furt h e r m o re, the endoscopist may miss glandular gastric ulcers. (Andrews 2002
    
Diffuse reddeing or inflammation may be only lesion seen in cases of early duodenal disease
 
Diffuse reddeing or inflammation may be only lesion seen in cases of early duodenal disease
 
In older foals with GDUD, detection ofgastrci outflow obsturction is critical to therapeutic plan and appropriate prognosis (Sanchez)
 
In older foals with GDUD, detection ofgastrci outflow obsturction is critical to therapeutic plan and appropriate prognosis (Sanchez)
  −
Minimum endoscope length of two metres and 2.8-3.0 metre instruments are required for duodenoscopy
  −
A 3 mtre endoscope allows visualization of stomach, pyrlorus and proximal duodenum (Sanchez)
  −
Shorter scopes permit investigation fo gastric body and fundus only (Sanchez)
  −
Maximum external diameter of 9mm for neonates (Sanchez)
  −
Foals - lesions mainly in glandular epithelium
  −
Adults - margo plicatus and squamous epithelium
  −
  −
Endoscopy is the primary method used for the identification of gastric ulceration in the live animal (Murray et al. 2001a) and numerous gross scoring systems combining lesion number and severity have been developed for classification purposes (Hammond et al. 1986; Johnson et al. 1994; Vatistas et al. 1994;Murray and Eichorn 1996; MacAllister et al. 1997; Anon 1999).
  −
While these systems are useful for assessing the extent of disease and monitoring response to treatment, little work has been done to correlate gross observations with the histological picture. Lesions that appear alike grossly and receive similar numerical scores may have dissimilar histological appearances and underlying pathogeneses.(Martineau 2009)
  −
  −
      
===Radiography===
 
===Radiography===
Line 217: Line 188:  
Furthermore, serum 1-antitrypsin was present in 44/47 foals with gastric ulcers compared to only 3/22 healthy foals (Taharaguchi et al. 2007). 1-antitrypsin may be released into serum from damaged gastric tissue, but more research is needed to validate this serum marker as a diagnostic test for EGUS.(Nadeau 2009)
 
Furthermore, serum 1-antitrypsin was present in 44/47 foals with gastric ulcers compared to only 3/22 healthy foals (Taharaguchi et al. 2007). 1-antitrypsin may be released into serum from damaged gastric tissue, but more research is needed to validate this serum marker as a diagnostic test for EGUS.(Nadeau 2009)
   −
 
+
Other diagnostic methods include measuring urine and plasma sucrose concentration (sucrose permeability tests) (O’Conner et al. 2004; Hewetson et al. 2006). However, methods for measuring sucrose require sophisticated analysis equipment, which may not be practical for clinicians in the field.
 +
(Nadeau 2009)
 
===Pathology===
 
===Pathology===
  
1,406

edits

Navigation menu