Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6,998 bytes added ,  23:59, 16 February 2010
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
{{review}}
 +
 +
==Introduction==
 +
[[Image:Pedunculated sarcoid donkey.jpg|right|thumb|200px|<small><center>A large pedunculated (Type 1a, fibroblastic) sarcoid.
 +
This was removed using laser surgery and after three years no recurrence was present.(Image courtesy of  [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary])</center></small>]]
 +
[[Image:Large sarcoid donkey.jpg|right|thumb|200px|<small><center>A large fibroblastic (Type 2, sessile) sarcoid on the medial stifle region that recurred each time following ill-advised attempts to remove it surgically.(Image courtesy of  [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary])</center></small>]]
 +
This is by far the commonest skin tumour of the donkey worldwide and it
 +
has, therefore, been the subject of a considerable research effort centred at
 +
the University of Glasgow in particular, in co-operation with [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary].
 +
 +
A '''virus aetiology''' has been suggested, but the epidemiology in both
 +
horses and donkeys is not fully explained by this possibility. There are clearly
 +
aspects of oncogenic mechanisms that are involved in the condition. There
 +
are families that appear to be particularly susceptible and there is much
 +
anecdotal evidence of ‘contagion’.
 +
 +
There is no doubt that donkeys are severely affected, but the type and
 +
distribution of the sarcoid is somewhat different from that seen in horses.
 +
<u>Donkeys appear to be more liable to severe, invasive and fibroblastic lesions</u>.
 +
Occult and verrucose sarcoids are less often reported, although whether this is because they are not recognised as
 +
easily, or whether they are genuinely less prevalent, is unknown.
 +
 +
==Predilection sites==
 +
 +
Predilection sites for sarcoid in donkeys include the '''face''' (especially around the '''mouth''' and '''eyes''') and
 +
in particular the '''groin''' and '''sheath''' regions.
 +
 +
Any mass around the eye should be considered for sarcoid, as it is a predilection site. It is normally obvious by its appearance and nature.
 +
 +
==Diagnosis==
 +
 +
Notwithstanding the diagnostic benefit that can be derived from biopsy it is probably unwise to
 +
biopsy a sarcoid lesion without a plan for its immediate treatment.
 +
 +
==Treatment==
 +
 +
Prompt action must be taken. Referral should be considered, as the treatment options are limited. Take a photograph and describe precisely if advice is sought.
 +
 +
The treatments available are very limited and all have problems of one sort or another. The reality is that
 +
early treatment of any sarcoid may serve at least to limit the long-term severity, but ill-advised attempts
 +
that lack proper thought may simply exacerbate the problem.
 +
 +
===Surgical excision===
 +
 +
Surgical excision may be an effective option where the limits of the sarcoid can be defined, but simply debriding
 +
the bulk of the lesion or failure to include a wide enough margin may result in a dramatic deterioration.
 +
 +
It is now well established that recurrence at the site of a sarcoid
 +
excision surgery is a common feature and that this can arise either from
 +
partial excision or from seeding of the operative site with cells from the
 +
lesion itself. In D. Knottenbelt’s experience, the latter results in more extensive
 +
exacerbation than the former.
 +
 +
===Cryosurgery===
 +
 +
Cryosurgery is also possible but suffers from the same limitations. The
 +
hitherto recognised ‘remote’ effects on sarcoids at other sites (suggested to
 +
be due to haematogenous cryo-antigens released into the blood) do not occur
 +
in donkeys in D. Knottenbelt’s experience. Cryosurgery is limited in its efficacy
 +
to small lesions in convenient sites and to limited numbers. The simple
 +
application of liquid nitrogen to the skin of any animal without proper
 +
control or the use of thermocouples and uncontrolled freezing with liquid
 +
nitrogen applied directly is totally unacceptable as a veterinary procedure.
 +
 +
===Thermal cautery and 'burning'===
 +
 +
‘Burning’ the lesions with red-hot irons and electrically heated wires are
 +
totally unacceptable – they are illogical, cruel and do nothing to help the
 +
disease. However, there are anecdotal reports of post-excisional thermal
 +
cautery carrying a better prognosis than surgery alone.
 +
 +
===Laser surgery and diathermy===
 +
 +
Laser surgery and diathermy are logical provided that they are carried
 +
out under controlled conditions by experienced surgeons.
 +
 +
===Immunological mechanisms===
 +
 +
Immunological mechanisms may be of value. There are anecdotal
 +
reports of the benefits of '''autologous blood injections''' but it is very hard
 +
to see any immunological benefit from this approach. The reality is that a
 +
'''few cases do seem to resolve spontaneously''' (although this seems to be less
 +
common in donkeys than in horses).
 +
 +
The use of '''intra-lesional BCG''' has been advocated and this appears
 +
to be a useful, but by no means certain, treatment for '''localised nodular
 +
and fibroblastic lesions around the eyes''' of the donkey. The critical factors
 +
appear to be the true intra-lesional injection; peri-lesional injection has no
 +
material benefit and risks the development of anaphylaxis. The mechanism
 +
for the effects of BCG are probably due to its intense chemotactic nature:
 +
macrophages and neutrophils and some mononuclear cells are actively
 +
drawn into the site and remove cells to which the BCG has adhered.
 +
Repeated injections are required and, as the tumour becomes necrotic and
 +
decays, true intra-lesional injection becomes more difficult.
 +
 +
===Cytotoxic compounds===
 +
 +
Topical cytotoxic compounds based on heavy metals and cytotoxic
 +
and antimitotic chemicals, such as '''cisplatin''' and '''5-fluorouracil''', are valuable
 +
because they are convenient and relatively cheap. '''AW4-LUDES''' from
 +
Liverpool University is possibly the best known of these. Often these are
 +
the only material options available. They do, however, cause much tissue
 +
necrosis and '''some pain is inevitable'''. The results suggest that some localised
 +
lesions, and those that have a superficial nature, are more susceptible to
 +
the methods, but again there are wide variations in response and not all
 +
lesions will respond.
 +
 +
===Other materials===
 +
 +
There are many questionable materials that purport to be effective
 +
treatments, but most of these (if not all) have no proven efficacy and have
 +
not been studied properly. For the most part unproven and non-veterinary
 +
treatments should be avoided as far as possible.
 +
The gold standard for treatment of the equine/asinine sarcoid is
 +
radiation but the availably of teletherapy and interstitial brachytherapy is
 +
very limited. The expense and practicality are severely limiting factors.
 +
 +
==References==
 +
 +
* Knottenbelt, D. (2008) Skin disorders In Svendsen, E.D., Duncan, J. and Hadrill, D. (2008) ''The Professional Handbook of the Donkey'', 4th edition, Whittet Books, Chapter 8
 +
* Grove, V. (2008) Conditions of the eye In Svendsen, E.D., Duncan, J. and Hadrill, D. (2008) ''The Professional Handbook of the Donkey'', 4th edition, Whittet Books, Chapter 11
 +
    
{{toplink
 
{{toplink
Author, Donkey, Bureaucrats, Administrators
53,803

edits

Navigation menu