Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | {{review}} |
| + | |
| + | ==Introduction== |
| + | [[Image:Pedunculated sarcoid donkey.jpg|right|thumb|200px|<small><center>A large pedunculated (Type 1a, fibroblastic) sarcoid. |
| + | This was removed using laser surgery and after three years no recurrence was present.(Image courtesy of [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary])</center></small>]] |
| + | [[Image:Large sarcoid donkey.jpg|right|thumb|200px|<small><center>A large fibroblastic (Type 2, sessile) sarcoid on the medial stifle region that recurred each time following ill-advised attempts to remove it surgically.(Image courtesy of [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary])</center></small>]] |
| + | This is by far the commonest skin tumour of the donkey worldwide and it |
| + | has, therefore, been the subject of a considerable research effort centred at |
| + | the University of Glasgow in particular, in co-operation with [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary]. |
| + | |
| + | A '''virus aetiology''' has been suggested, but the epidemiology in both |
| + | horses and donkeys is not fully explained by this possibility. There are clearly |
| + | aspects of oncogenic mechanisms that are involved in the condition. There |
| + | are families that appear to be particularly susceptible and there is much |
| + | anecdotal evidence of ‘contagion’. |
| + | |
| + | There is no doubt that donkeys are severely affected, but the type and |
| + | distribution of the sarcoid is somewhat different from that seen in horses. |
| + | <u>Donkeys appear to be more liable to severe, invasive and fibroblastic lesions</u>. |
| + | Occult and verrucose sarcoids are less often reported, although whether this is because they are not recognised as |
| + | easily, or whether they are genuinely less prevalent, is unknown. |
| + | |
| + | ==Predilection sites== |
| + | |
| + | Predilection sites for sarcoid in donkeys include the '''face''' (especially around the '''mouth''' and '''eyes''') and |
| + | in particular the '''groin''' and '''sheath''' regions. |
| + | |
| + | Any mass around the eye should be considered for sarcoid, as it is a predilection site. It is normally obvious by its appearance and nature. |
| + | |
| + | ==Diagnosis== |
| + | |
| + | Notwithstanding the diagnostic benefit that can be derived from biopsy it is probably unwise to |
| + | biopsy a sarcoid lesion without a plan for its immediate treatment. |
| + | |
| + | ==Treatment== |
| + | |
| + | Prompt action must be taken. Referral should be considered, as the treatment options are limited. Take a photograph and describe precisely if advice is sought. |
| + | |
| + | The treatments available are very limited and all have problems of one sort or another. The reality is that |
| + | early treatment of any sarcoid may serve at least to limit the long-term severity, but ill-advised attempts |
| + | that lack proper thought may simply exacerbate the problem. |
| + | |
| + | ===Surgical excision=== |
| + | |
| + | Surgical excision may be an effective option where the limits of the sarcoid can be defined, but simply debriding |
| + | the bulk of the lesion or failure to include a wide enough margin may result in a dramatic deterioration. |
| + | |
| + | It is now well established that recurrence at the site of a sarcoid |
| + | excision surgery is a common feature and that this can arise either from |
| + | partial excision or from seeding of the operative site with cells from the |
| + | lesion itself. In D. Knottenbelt’s experience, the latter results in more extensive |
| + | exacerbation than the former. |
| + | |
| + | ===Cryosurgery=== |
| + | |
| + | Cryosurgery is also possible but suffers from the same limitations. The |
| + | hitherto recognised ‘remote’ effects on sarcoids at other sites (suggested to |
| + | be due to haematogenous cryo-antigens released into the blood) do not occur |
| + | in donkeys in D. Knottenbelt’s experience. Cryosurgery is limited in its efficacy |
| + | to small lesions in convenient sites and to limited numbers. The simple |
| + | application of liquid nitrogen to the skin of any animal without proper |
| + | control or the use of thermocouples and uncontrolled freezing with liquid |
| + | nitrogen applied directly is totally unacceptable as a veterinary procedure. |
| + | |
| + | ===Thermal cautery and 'burning'=== |
| + | |
| + | ‘Burning’ the lesions with red-hot irons and electrically heated wires are |
| + | totally unacceptable – they are illogical, cruel and do nothing to help the |
| + | disease. However, there are anecdotal reports of post-excisional thermal |
| + | cautery carrying a better prognosis than surgery alone. |
| + | |
| + | ===Laser surgery and diathermy=== |
| + | |
| + | Laser surgery and diathermy are logical provided that they are carried |
| + | out under controlled conditions by experienced surgeons. |
| + | |
| + | ===Immunological mechanisms=== |
| + | |
| + | Immunological mechanisms may be of value. There are anecdotal |
| + | reports of the benefits of '''autologous blood injections''' but it is very hard |
| + | to see any immunological benefit from this approach. The reality is that a |
| + | '''few cases do seem to resolve spontaneously''' (although this seems to be less |
| + | common in donkeys than in horses). |
| + | |
| + | The use of '''intra-lesional BCG''' has been advocated and this appears |
| + | to be a useful, but by no means certain, treatment for '''localised nodular |
| + | and fibroblastic lesions around the eyes''' of the donkey. The critical factors |
| + | appear to be the true intra-lesional injection; peri-lesional injection has no |
| + | material benefit and risks the development of anaphylaxis. The mechanism |
| + | for the effects of BCG are probably due to its intense chemotactic nature: |
| + | macrophages and neutrophils and some mononuclear cells are actively |
| + | drawn into the site and remove cells to which the BCG has adhered. |
| + | Repeated injections are required and, as the tumour becomes necrotic and |
| + | decays, true intra-lesional injection becomes more difficult. |
| + | |
| + | ===Cytotoxic compounds=== |
| + | |
| + | Topical cytotoxic compounds based on heavy metals and cytotoxic |
| + | and antimitotic chemicals, such as '''cisplatin''' and '''5-fluorouracil''', are valuable |
| + | because they are convenient and relatively cheap. '''AW4-LUDES''' from |
| + | Liverpool University is possibly the best known of these. Often these are |
| + | the only material options available. They do, however, cause much tissue |
| + | necrosis and '''some pain is inevitable'''. The results suggest that some localised |
| + | lesions, and those that have a superficial nature, are more susceptible to |
| + | the methods, but again there are wide variations in response and not all |
| + | lesions will respond. |
| + | |
| + | ===Other materials=== |
| + | |
| + | There are many questionable materials that purport to be effective |
| + | treatments, but most of these (if not all) have no proven efficacy and have |
| + | not been studied properly. For the most part unproven and non-veterinary |
| + | treatments should be avoided as far as possible. |
| + | The gold standard for treatment of the equine/asinine sarcoid is |
| + | radiation but the availably of teletherapy and interstitial brachytherapy is |
| + | very limited. The expense and practicality are severely limiting factors. |
| + | |
| + | ==References== |
| + | |
| + | * Knottenbelt, D. (2008) Skin disorders In Svendsen, E.D., Duncan, J. and Hadrill, D. (2008) ''The Professional Handbook of the Donkey'', 4th edition, Whittet Books, Chapter 8 |
| + | * Grove, V. (2008) Conditions of the eye In Svendsen, E.D., Duncan, J. and Hadrill, D. (2008) ''The Professional Handbook of the Donkey'', 4th edition, Whittet Books, Chapter 11 |
| + | |
| | | |
| {{toplink | | {{toplink |