Line 64: |
Line 64: |
| | | |
| ===Adulticidal Treatment=== | | ===Adulticidal Treatment=== |
− | The decision as to whether or not to treat a dog with
| + | |
− | heartworm disease and the relative prognosis depend on | + | Decisions in the treatment of heartworm disease are dependent on the severity of infection. A scheme exists to classify patients in terms of disease severity<sup>2</sup>. Class one patients have subclinical heartworm disease, and carry an excellent prognosis following treatment wiht adulticidal drugs. Class two animals show mild to moderate clinical signs and similar radiographic changes. These animals may respond positively to treatment. Dogs with class 3 disease have severe clinical signs, such as persistent coughing, dyspnoea, right-sided heart failure or haemoptysis, and these are reflected by severe radiographic signs. These cases have a high risk of pulmonary thromboembolism and so prognosis is guarded and the benefits of adulticidal treatment should be considered carefully. |
− | the severity of the infection. In an attempt to assess this, | + | |
− | animals may be classified as:
| + | Even low grade infections in cats may result in pulmonary thromboembolism with adulticidal treatment, and spontaneous remission is seen in some cats. Because of this, symptomatic treatment (cage rest, oxygen supplementation, fluid therapy, bronchodilators and dexamethasone) may be more appropriate in sick cats, and clinically well cats can merely be monitored regularly for remission. Adulticidal treatment should only be considered in cats that fail to respond to supportive treatments but are in a stable condition. |
− | * CLASS 1. Patients with subclinical or no clinical signs;
| + | |
− | * CLASS 2. Patients with mild to moderate clinical signs
| |
− | and mild to moderate radiographic changes; | |
− | * CLASS 3. Patients with severe clinical signs (eg, persistent
| |
− | cough, haemoptysis, dyspnoea, right-sided heart
| |
− | failure) and severe radiographic changes. | |
− | The prognosis for dogs in class 1 following adulticidal
| |
− | treatment is generally very good. Dogs in class 2
| |
− | may have a positive outcome. Animals in class 3 have a
| |
− | guarded prognosis due to the high risk of pulmonary
| |
− | thromboembolism; in these cases, the potential complications | |
− | of adulticidal treatment should be thoroughly | |
− | discussed with the owners.
| |
− | In cats, adulticidal treatment may be dangerous even
| |
− | in patients with low grade infection, and pulmonary | |
− | thromboembolism due to premature death of parasites is a common complication. Considering that some cats
| |
− | may undergo spontaneous clinical remission if parasites
| |
− | die naturally, periodic monitoring of the patient is more
| |
− | appropriate than adulticidal treatment. Cats with respiratory
| |
− | signs can be treated symptomatically in the same way
| |
− | as patients with feline asthma. Cage rest, oxygen supplementation,
| |
− | fluid therapy, bronchodilators and injectable | |
− | steroids (eg, dexamethasone) can be used to stabilise
| |
− | acutely ill cats. Adulticidal treatment should only be considered
| |
− | for cats in a stable condition that fail to respond to
| |
− | supportive treatments. | |
| Adulticidal treatment involves the administration of | | Adulticidal treatment involves the administration of |
| a new generation arsenical compound, melarsomine dihydrochloride | | a new generation arsenical compound, melarsomine dihydrochloride |