Difference between revisions of "Cytology Q&A 17"
Ggaitskell (talk | contribs) |
Ggaitskell (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Template:Manson | + | {{Template:Manson}} |
| − | |||
| − | [[Image: | + | [[Image:|centre|500px]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 17: | ||
*The spindle cells have granular, evenly distributed chromatin and the nuclei contain one to several small but distinct nucleoli. | *The spindle cells have granular, evenly distributed chromatin and the nuclei contain one to several small but distinct nucleoli. | ||
*The cytoplasm is wispy and often has bipolar extensions. | *The cytoplasm is wispy and often has bipolar extensions. | ||
| − | |l1= | + | |l1= |
|q2=What is your interpretation of these findings? | |q2=What is your interpretation of these findings? | ||
|a2= | |a2= | ||
The cytological features are consistent with moderate to marked pyogranulomatous inflammation with spindle cell proliferation, most likely fibroplasia. | The cytological features are consistent with moderate to marked pyogranulomatous inflammation with spindle cell proliferation, most likely fibroplasia. | ||
| − | |l2= | + | |l2= |
|q3=What comments do you have regarding these findings? | |q3=What comments do you have regarding these findings? | ||
|a3= | |a3= | ||
| Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
However, in some cases, spindle cell proliferations may be difficult to differentiate and it may be difficult or impossible to separate fibroplasia from an actively growing benign tumour or a malignant one. <br><br> | However, in some cases, spindle cell proliferations may be difficult to differentiate and it may be difficult or impossible to separate fibroplasia from an actively growing benign tumour or a malignant one. <br><br> | ||
Cellularity, degree of atypia and other concurrent features all have to be considered. In some cases, cytological evaluation can help separate these conditions with a high degree of confidence.<br><br> | Cellularity, degree of atypia and other concurrent features all have to be considered. In some cases, cytological evaluation can help separate these conditions with a high degree of confidence.<br><br> | ||
| − | In others the differential diagnoses cannot be differentiated on the basis of cytology alone and a biopsy will be needed to determine the definitive diagnosis. | + | In others the differential diagnoses cannot be differentiated on the basis of cytology alone and a biopsy will be needed to determine the definitive diagnosis. |
| − | |l3= | + | |l3= |
</FlashCard> | </FlashCard> | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 8 August 2011
| This question was provided by Manson Publishing as part of the OVAL Project. See more [[:Category:{{{book}}}|{{{book}}}]]. |
[[Image:|centre|500px]]
A seven-year-old neutered male Jack Russell Terrier presented with an interdigital mass of several weeks’ duration. Smears were made from an aspirate of the mass.
| Question | Answer | Article | |
| What features are illustrated in these photomicrographs (both Wright–Giemsa, ×50 oil)? |
|
[[|Link to Article]] | |
| What is your interpretation of these findings? | The cytological features are consistent with moderate to marked pyogranulomatous inflammation with spindle cell proliferation, most likely fibroplasia. |
[[|Link to Article]] | |
| What comments do you have regarding these findings? |
Atypical spindle cells with nucleoli and increased numbers typical of proliferation represent a diagnostic problem for all cytologists. In others the differential diagnoses cannot be differentiated on the basis of cytology alone and a biopsy will be needed to determine the definitive diagnosis. |
[[|Link to Article]] | |