Difference between revisions of "Ileal Impaction - Horse"
| (26 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{unfinished}} |
| − | Also known as: ''''' | + | |
| + | |||
| + | {| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
| + | | Also known as: | ||
| + | |'''Colic<br> | ||
| + | '''Impaction<br> | ||
| + | '''Simple Obstruction<br> | ||
| + | '''Small Intestinal Simple Obstruction<br> | ||
| + | '''Small Intestinal Obstruction<br> | ||
| + | '''Small Intestinal Impaction''' | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| − | == | + | ==Description== |
| + | |||
The most common condition causing simple obstruction of the small intestinal lumen.<ref name="Merck">Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''.</ref> | The most common condition causing simple obstruction of the small intestinal lumen.<ref name="Merck">Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''.</ref> | ||
==Signalment== | ==Signalment== | ||
| + | |||
Adult horses | Adult horses | ||
| Line 12: | Line 25: | ||
==Aetiology== | ==Aetiology== | ||
| − | In the southeastern United States, feeding of poor quality coastal Bermuda hay and lack of administration of the anthelmintic pyrantel pamoate have been implicated as risk factors.<ref>Little, D, Blikslager, A.T (2002) Factors associated with development of ileal impaction in horses with surgical colic:78 cases (1986-2000). ''Equine Vet J'' 34(5):464-8.</ref> It is proposed that when this forage has a high fibre content, there is an increased proportion of thin fibres which are prematurely swallowed. | + | |
| + | In the southeastern United States, feeding of poor quality coastal Bermuda hay and lack of administration of the anthelmintic pyrantel pamoate have been implicated as risk factors.<ref>Little, D, Blikslager, A.T (2002) Factors associated with development of ileal impaction in horses with surgical colic:78 cases (1986-2000). ''Equine Vet J'' 34(5):464-8.</ref> It is proposed that when this forage has a high fibre content, there is an increased proportion of thin fibres which are prematurely swallowed.(Bliks) Sudden feed changes may also contribute.<ref>Parks, A.H.A, Allen, D (1998) ''The purported role of coastal Bermuda hay in the etiology of ileal impactions: results of a questionnaire (abstract), 6th Equine Colic Research Symposium'', University of Georgia, p37. In:</ref> In the UK, infection with the tapeworm [[Anoplocephala|''Anoplocephala perfoliata'']] is an important risk factor. Proudman and colleagues (1998) found that more than 80% of ileal impactions were associated with serological or faecal evidence of tapeworm infection.<ref>Proudman, C.J, French, N.P, Trees, A.J (1998) Tapeworm infection is a significant risk factor for spasmodic colic and ileal impaction colic in the horse. ''Equine Vet J'', 30:194-199.</ref> ''Anoplocephala perfoliata'' infects up to 60% of horses in some geographical areas and has also been implicated as a risk factor for bowel irritation and spasmodic colic.<ref name="Kania">Kania, S.A, Reinemeyer, C.R (2005) ''Anoplocephala perfoliata'' coproantigen detection: a preliminary study. ''Vet Parasitol'', 127(2):115-9.</ref>Impaction may also develop secondary to spastic contractions of the ileal musculature against ingesta.<ref name="Merck">Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''.</ref> | ||
==Clinical Signs== | ==Clinical Signs== | ||
| − | Typical [[Colic Diagnosis - Clinical Signs| | + | |
| + | Typical signs associated with [[Colic Diagnosis - Clinical Signs|small intestinal obstruction]]: | ||
*Moderate to severe colic | *Moderate to severe colic | ||
*Reduced [[Colic Diagnosis - Abdominal Auscultation|borborygmi]] | *Reduced [[Colic Diagnosis - Abdominal Auscultation|borborygmi]] | ||
| Line 22: | Line 37: | ||
==Diagnosis== | ==Diagnosis== | ||
| − | Early [[Colic Diagnosis - Rectal Examination|rectal examination]] may reveal the impaction low in the right caudal abdominal quadrant. Subsequent distention of the jejunum will be palpable ''per rectum'' but may preclude palpation of the impaction, thus the definitive diagnosis is often made at surgery. Many horses with ileal impaction are delayed in their referral because initially their colic is mild and their condition deceptively stable. [[Colic - | + | |
| + | Early [[Colic Diagnosis - Rectal Examination|rectal examination]] may reveal the impaction low in the right caudal abdominal quadrant. Subsequent distention of the jejunum will be palpable ''per rectum'' but may preclude palpation of the impaction, thus the definitive diagnosis is often made at surgery. Many horses with ileal impaction are delayed in their referral because initially their colic is mild and their condition deceptively stable. [[Colic Diagnosis - Abdominocentesis|Abdominocentesis]] may show an elevated protein concentration if the impaction has persisted for more than about 18 hours.<ref name="Merck">Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''.</ref> The most likely differential diagnosis is proximal jejunitis, which can be challenging to rule out. | ||
==Treatment== | ==Treatment== | ||
| − | |||
| − | ''' | + | [[Colic, Medical Treatment|Medical treatment]] with fluids and liquid paraffin may resolve the impaction early on(36) but '''surgery''' is typically required. At surgery, fluids such as saline or carboxymethylcellulose can be directly infused into the mass so that the impaction can be manually broken down and massaged into the caecum. '''Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS)''' may be included in the infusion to help disrupt the mass. An enterotomy in the distal jejunum should be considered to evacuate impacted contents and reduce intestinal manipulation.Theileal impaction was reduced by extraluminal massage aided by admixing of intestinal fluid oral to the impaction or injection of fluids intraluminally and then movement of the ingesta into the cecum. One horse initially treated by manual reduction required jejunocecostomy twice for management of recurrent ileal impaction.Ileal impactions can be successfully reduced by celiotomy and extraluminal massage and injection techniques to soften the ingesta for passage into the cecum without enterotomy or bypass techniques in most horses. (Hanson) |
| + | |||
| + | Treatment consisted of intravenous administration of a balanced electrolyte solution, nasogastric intubation and siphonage, and administration of analgesics. Mineral oil was administered after gastric reflux had ceased. Mean time for resolution of ileal impaction was 11.7 hours. | ||
| + | Medical treatment may be a viable alternative for horses that cannot have surgery,provided persistent signs of severe pain or progressive gaseous distention ofthe small intestine are not features of the condition. Improvement ofcardiovascular status, reduction in signs of abdominal pain, decrease in distentionof loops of small intestine during repeated transrectal examination, softeningof the impaction, and decreases in amounts of gastric reflux were indicative ofa response to medical treatment.(Hanson Schumacher) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reflux is found in 50% of horses requiring surgical conrrection for ileal impaction(35,41) | ||
==Complications== | ==Complications== | ||
| + | |||
Small intestinal distension and manipulation of the ileum at surgery may lead to '''post-operative ileus'''<ref>Blikslager, A.T, Bowman, K.F, Levine, J.F, ''et al.'' (1994) Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative ileus in horses: 31 cases (1990-1992). ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 205:1748-1752.</ref> but the risk is reduced if the duration between disease onset and surgical intervention is decreased.<ref name="Hanson">Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. ''Vet Surg'', 27(6):555-60.</ref> Depending on the degree of damage to the serosal surface of the small intestine at surgery, complications may develop several weeks after surgery due to intra-abdominal '''adhesions'''.<ref name="Merck">Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''.</ref> Most of the problems related to adhesions are thought to occur within 2 months.<ref name="Baxter">Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. ''Vet Surg'', 18(6):409-14.</ref> | Small intestinal distension and manipulation of the ileum at surgery may lead to '''post-operative ileus'''<ref>Blikslager, A.T, Bowman, K.F, Levine, J.F, ''et al.'' (1994) Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative ileus in horses: 31 cases (1990-1992). ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 205:1748-1752.</ref> but the risk is reduced if the duration between disease onset and surgical intervention is decreased.<ref name="Hanson">Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. ''Vet Surg'', 27(6):555-60.</ref> Depending on the degree of damage to the serosal surface of the small intestine at surgery, complications may develop several weeks after surgery due to intra-abdominal '''adhesions'''.<ref name="Merck">Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''.</ref> Most of the problems related to adhesions are thought to occur within 2 months.<ref name="Baxter">Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. ''Vet Surg'', 18(6):409-14.</ref> | ||
==Prognosis== | ==Prognosis== | ||
| + | |||
The prognosis for survival is generally good.<ref name="Hanson">Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. ''Vet Surg'', 27(6):555-60.</ref><ref name="Hanson 2">Hanson, R.R, Schumacher, J, Humburg, J, Dunkerkley, S.C (1996) Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990-1994). ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 208(6):898-900.</ref> The shorter the duration of colic before surgical intervention, the better the prognosis.<ref>Embertson, R.M, Colahan, P.T, Brown, M.P, Peyton, L.C, Schneider, R.K, Granstedt, M.E (1985) Ileal impaction in the horse. ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 186(6):570-2.</ref> The requirement for enterotomy, enterectomy, jejunocecostomy during surgery<ref>Parks, A.H, Doran, A.E, White, N.A, Allen, D, Baxter, G.M (1989) Ileal impaction in the horse: 75 cases. ''Cornell Vet'', 79(1):83-91.</ref> and the development of postoperative adhesions have all been associated with a poorer prognosis for survival.<ref name="Baxter">Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. ''Vet Surg'', 18(6):409-14.</ref> | The prognosis for survival is generally good.<ref name="Hanson">Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. ''Vet Surg'', 27(6):555-60.</ref><ref name="Hanson 2">Hanson, R.R, Schumacher, J, Humburg, J, Dunkerkley, S.C (1996) Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990-1994). ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 208(6):898-900.</ref> The shorter the duration of colic before surgical intervention, the better the prognosis.<ref>Embertson, R.M, Colahan, P.T, Brown, M.P, Peyton, L.C, Schneider, R.K, Granstedt, M.E (1985) Ileal impaction in the horse. ''J Am Vet Med Assoc'', 186(6):570-2.</ref> The requirement for enterotomy, enterectomy, jejunocecostomy during surgery<ref>Parks, A.H, Doran, A.E, White, N.A, Allen, D, Baxter, G.M (1989) Ileal impaction in the horse: 75 cases. ''Cornell Vet'', 79(1):83-91.</ref> and the development of postoperative adhesions have all been associated with a poorer prognosis for survival.<ref name="Baxter">Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. ''Vet Surg'', 18(6):409-14.</ref> | ||
==Prevention== | ==Prevention== | ||
| + | |||
*Adequate and appropriate feeding of good quality forage | *Adequate and appropriate feeding of good quality forage | ||
*Avoidance of sudden dietary changes | *Avoidance of sudden dietary changes | ||
| Line 41: | Line 64: | ||
*Avoid practices that encourage the development of [[Anthelmintic Resistance|anthelmintic resistance]] | *Avoid practices that encourage the development of [[Anthelmintic Resistance|anthelmintic resistance]] | ||
| − | + | Faceal worm egg counts do not reliably detect horses infected with ''A.perfoliata''. An ELISA to test for the host antibody response to tapeworms has been developed with a reported sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 95%.<ref>Proudman, C.J, Trees, A.J (1996) Use of excretory/secretory antigens for the serodiagnosis of ''Anoplocephala perfoliata'' cestodosis. ''Vet Parasitol'', 61:239-247.</ref> Although this test is useful for detecting horses with a high intensity of infection, it measures past and current infection so must be interpreted in light of the anthelmintic history. More recently, a coproantigen capture ELISA has demonstrated some promise in a small sample of horses.<ref name="Kania">Kania, S.A, Reinemeyer, C.R (2005) ''Anoplocephala perfoliata'' coproantigen detection: a preliminary study. ''Vet Parasitol'', 127(2):115-9.</ref> Such tests may be used as part of a '''targeted strategic dosing''' programme for anthelmintic administration. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Intestine_-_Mechanical_Obstruction]] | [[Category:Intestine_-_Mechanical_Obstruction]] | ||
[[Category:Surgical_Colic_in_the_Horse]] | [[Category:Surgical_Colic_in_the_Horse]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:To_Do_-_Nina]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 13:31, 8 August 2010
 |
This article is still under construction. |
| Also known as: | Colic Impaction |
Description
The most common condition causing simple obstruction of the small intestinal lumen.[1]
Signalment
Adult horses
Prevalence
Ileal impaction occurs most frequently in the southeastern USA, Germany and The Netherlands.[1] In the southeastern USA, there appears to be an increased prevalence in the autumn which may relate to changing weather and feedng regimes at that time of year.[2]
Aetiology
In the southeastern United States, feeding of poor quality coastal Bermuda hay and lack of administration of the anthelmintic pyrantel pamoate have been implicated as risk factors.[3] It is proposed that when this forage has a high fibre content, there is an increased proportion of thin fibres which are prematurely swallowed.(Bliks) Sudden feed changes may also contribute.[4] In the UK, infection with the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata is an important risk factor. Proudman and colleagues (1998) found that more than 80% of ileal impactions were associated with serological or faecal evidence of tapeworm infection.[5] Anoplocephala perfoliata infects up to 60% of horses in some geographical areas and has also been implicated as a risk factor for bowel irritation and spasmodic colic.[6]Impaction may also develop secondary to spastic contractions of the ileal musculature against ingesta.[1]
Clinical Signs
Typical signs associated with small intestinal obstruction:
- Moderate to severe colic
- Reduced borborygmi
- Tachycardia
- Nasogastric reflux may take a considerable time to develop because the ileum is the distal-most part of the small intestine.
Diagnosis
Early rectal examination may reveal the impaction low in the right caudal abdominal quadrant. Subsequent distention of the jejunum will be palpable per rectum but may preclude palpation of the impaction, thus the definitive diagnosis is often made at surgery. Many horses with ileal impaction are delayed in their referral because initially their colic is mild and their condition deceptively stable. Abdominocentesis may show an elevated protein concentration if the impaction has persisted for more than about 18 hours.[1] The most likely differential diagnosis is proximal jejunitis, which can be challenging to rule out.
Treatment
Medical treatment with fluids and liquid paraffin may resolve the impaction early on(36) but surgery is typically required. At surgery, fluids such as saline or carboxymethylcellulose can be directly infused into the mass so that the impaction can be manually broken down and massaged into the caecum. Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) may be included in the infusion to help disrupt the mass. An enterotomy in the distal jejunum should be considered to evacuate impacted contents and reduce intestinal manipulation.Theileal impaction was reduced by extraluminal massage aided by admixing of intestinal fluid oral to the impaction or injection of fluids intraluminally and then movement of the ingesta into the cecum. One horse initially treated by manual reduction required jejunocecostomy twice for management of recurrent ileal impaction.Ileal impactions can be successfully reduced by celiotomy and extraluminal massage and injection techniques to soften the ingesta for passage into the cecum without enterotomy or bypass techniques in most horses. (Hanson)
Treatment consisted of intravenous administration of a balanced electrolyte solution, nasogastric intubation and siphonage, and administration of analgesics. Mineral oil was administered after gastric reflux had ceased. Mean time for resolution of ileal impaction was 11.7 hours. Medical treatment may be a viable alternative for horses that cannot have surgery,provided persistent signs of severe pain or progressive gaseous distention ofthe small intestine are not features of the condition. Improvement ofcardiovascular status, reduction in signs of abdominal pain, decrease in distentionof loops of small intestine during repeated transrectal examination, softeningof the impaction, and decreases in amounts of gastric reflux were indicative ofa response to medical treatment.(Hanson Schumacher)
Reflux is found in 50% of horses requiring surgical conrrection for ileal impaction(35,41)
Complications
Small intestinal distension and manipulation of the ileum at surgery may lead to post-operative ileus[7] but the risk is reduced if the duration between disease onset and surgical intervention is decreased.[2] Depending on the degree of damage to the serosal surface of the small intestine at surgery, complications may develop several weeks after surgery due to intra-abdominal adhesions.[1] Most of the problems related to adhesions are thought to occur within 2 months.[8]
Prognosis
The prognosis for survival is generally good.[2][9] The shorter the duration of colic before surgical intervention, the better the prognosis.[10] The requirement for enterotomy, enterectomy, jejunocecostomy during surgery[11] and the development of postoperative adhesions have all been associated with a poorer prognosis for survival.[8]
Prevention
- Adequate and appropriate feeding of good quality forage
- Avoidance of sudden dietary changes
- An adequate tapeworm control programme
- Avoid practices that encourage the development of anthelmintic resistance
Faceal worm egg counts do not reliably detect horses infected with A.perfoliata. An ELISA to test for the host antibody response to tapeworms has been developed with a reported sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 95%.[12] Although this test is useful for detecting horses with a high intensity of infection, it measures past and current infection so must be interpreted in light of the anthelmintic history. More recently, a coproantigen capture ELISA has demonstrated some promise in a small sample of horses.[6] Such tests may be used as part of a targeted strategic dosing programme for anthelmintic administration.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Merck & Co (2008) The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition), Merial.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Hanson, R.R, Wright, J.C, Schumacher, J, Baird, A.N, Humburg, J, Pugh, D.G (1998) Surgical reduction of ileal impactions in the horse: 28 cases. Vet Surg, 27(6):555-60. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "Hanson" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>tag; name "Hanson" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Little, D, Blikslager, A.T (2002) Factors associated with development of ileal impaction in horses with surgical colic:78 cases (1986-2000). Equine Vet J 34(5):464-8.
- ↑ Parks, A.H.A, Allen, D (1998) The purported role of coastal Bermuda hay in the etiology of ileal impactions: results of a questionnaire (abstract), 6th Equine Colic Research Symposium, University of Georgia, p37. In:
- ↑ Proudman, C.J, French, N.P, Trees, A.J (1998) Tapeworm infection is a significant risk factor for spasmodic colic and ileal impaction colic in the horse. Equine Vet J, 30:194-199.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Kania, S.A, Reinemeyer, C.R (2005) Anoplocephala perfoliata coproantigen detection: a preliminary study. Vet Parasitol, 127(2):115-9. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "Kania" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Blikslager, A.T, Bowman, K.F, Levine, J.F, et al. (1994) Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative ileus in horses: 31 cases (1990-1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 205:1748-1752.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Baxter, G.M, Broome, T.E, Moore, J.N (1989) Abdominal adhesions after small intestinal surgery in the horse. Vet Surg, 18(6):409-14.
- ↑ Hanson, R.R, Schumacher, J, Humburg, J, Dunkerkley, S.C (1996) Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 208(6):898-900.
- ↑ Embertson, R.M, Colahan, P.T, Brown, M.P, Peyton, L.C, Schneider, R.K, Granstedt, M.E (1985) Ileal impaction in the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 186(6):570-2.
- ↑ Parks, A.H, Doran, A.E, White, N.A, Allen, D, Baxter, G.M (1989) Ileal impaction in the horse: 75 cases. Cornell Vet, 79(1):83-91.
- ↑ Proudman, C.J, Trees, A.J (1996) Use of excretory/secretory antigens for the serodiagnosis of Anoplocephala perfoliata cestodosis. Vet Parasitol, 61:239-247.