Difference between revisions of "Gastric Impaction - Horse"
| (46 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{unfinished}} |
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Description== |
| − | Gastric impaction | + | Gastric impaction can occur as a primary condition but is often diagnosed at surgery as a finding secondary to other disturbances in the intestinal tract. In some cases there be predisposing causes such as ulceration or fibrosis at the pylorus, whereas in other cases it may occur spontaneously. |
| − | + | stomach impaction is that it typically causes mild-to-moderate colic that does not resolve with routine medical treatment. (Bliks) | |
| + | |||
| + | Stomach impaction is rare (Edwards) | ||
==Aetiology== | ==Aetiology== | ||
| − | + | Impaction of the stomach typically consists of excessive dry, fibrous ingesta, but may also be composed of ingested materials that form a mass, suchas persimmon seeds or mesquite beans.1-3 Other feeds that tend to swell after ingestion, including wheat, barley, and sugar beet pulp, may also cause impaction. Furthermore, dental disease may increase the likelihood of gastric impaction because of improper chewing of feed. (Bliks) | |
| + | Thecause of the impaction is often not known. However it may be the result of an intrinsic disturbance ofstomach function such as atony or defective secretion(Edwards) | ||
| + | |||
===Predisposing factors=== | ===Predisposing factors=== | ||
| − | *Ingestion of certain feedstuffs including | + | *Ingestion of certain feedstuffs including beet pulp, bran, straw, wheat and barley - beet pulp and bran can become dessicated within the stomach and may not become rehydrated by water or gastric secretions |
| − | *Dental disorders - roughage may be | + | *Dental disorders - roughage may be incompletely masticated |
*Feeding a horse that has signs of colic - there may be poor gastric emptying associated with generalised decreased gastrointestinal motility | *Feeding a horse that has signs of colic - there may be poor gastric emptying associated with generalised decreased gastrointestinal motility | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | secondary gastric impaction associated with ragwort poisoning(Milne) | |
==Clinical signs== | ==Clinical signs== | ||
| − | + | Abdominal discomfort | |
| − | + | If the signs are mild and resolve spontaneously or with analgesics, owners often inclined to feed the horse, worsening the impaction | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Clinical signs of colic range from acute and severe to chronic and mild. For example, in one report on 4 horses with gastric impaction, colic was moderate or severe and of 8-12 hours’ duration,4 whereas in another report on a pony with gastric impaction, colic was chronic (7 days’ duration), associated with prolonged recumbency, anorexia, and lethargy.3 Additional signs may include dysphagia, dropping of feed, and bruxism.3,5 | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Inits acute form it is usually characterised by severe abdominal pain but somehorses may present with intermittent | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Incontrast, chronic impaction of the stomach which appears to develop slowly overseveral weeks or even months has a poor prognosis | |
| + | verypoor prognosis (Edwards 1997, Huskamp, Scheidemann and Schusser 2000).Diagnosis is difficult in the early stages. | ||
| + | Despitethe extreme gastric filling, affected horses show very little or no evidence ofovert abdominal pain. They continue toeat and defaecate but tendto show insidious weight loss. Salivation and bruxism may occur.(Edwards) | ||
| + | Gastric impaction can result in acute or chronic signs of colic. Signs vary from anorexia and weight loss to those consistetn with severe abdominal pain. In severe cases pspontaenous reflux may occur, with gastric ocntentsvisible at the nares (Sanchez). | ||
==Diagnosis== | ==Diagnosis== | ||
| − | + | Suspected if cannot pass NGT, with gastric distension the gastoroesophageal junction can become distorted making it difficult to pass an NGT | |
| − | + | If poorly macerated or digested feed material is recovered from the NGT when the horse has been starved for several hrs | |
| − | + | On rectal, spleen may be displaced caudally and medially (not specific) | |
| − | + | Endoscopy (not diagnostic for impaction and difficult to assess gastric distension) | |
| − | + | Rads may help, will show diaphragm displaced cranially | |
| − | + | However, the diagnosis of stomach impaction is usually made at surgery on horses that have had uncontrollable colic or poor response to medicaltherapy. However, endoscopy will reveal gastric impaction, and may provide information on the specific nature of the impaction. Although this would nottypically be performed on an acute colic case, it would be indicated in a horse with chronic colic. (Bliks) | |
| + | |||
| + | Alateral radiograph of the cranial abdomen | ||
| + | showedthe stomach extending caudally from the diaphragm to the level of the 13th or14th intercostal space in several | ||
| + | cases.The sonographic appearance is of a markedly enlarged gastric echo extendingover six or more intercostal spaces onthe left side of theabdomen. A marked increase in the thickness of the wall of the stomach may alsobe imaged. (Edwards) | ||
==Treatment== | ==Treatment== | ||
| − | If | + | If suspected, horse should be tranferred with NGT in place to a faciltiy where surgery can be perfomed if necessary |
| − | + | Medical tx can include gastric lavage to remove as much impacted material as possible - may need to be done repeatedly | |
| − | + | 100-200ml 8%DSS may facilitate hydration of dessicated ingesta | |
| − | + | IV fluid and anlagesics should also be given, although unlikely that IV fluids will resolve the impaction | |
| − | + | Gastric motility stimulants should be avoided if the extent of the impaction is unkown to prevent gastric rupture | |
| − | + | Those diagnosed at sx may be treated with bethanecol at 0.2mg/kg SC every 8hrs | |
| − | + | Medical treatment includes nasogastric intubation, and frequent attempts at softening the ingesta with water, followed by refluxing the fluid contents. (BLiks) | |
| − | + | Surgery | |
| − | + | Direct infusion of balanced polyionic fluids into the impaction through the stomach wall | |
| + | Stomach massaged to break down impaction and facilitate movement of fluid into the ingesta | ||
| + | Or fluid may be infused via NGT followed by massage of the stomach | ||
| + | Post-op starve for 48-72hrs | ||
| + | Gastroscopy indicated to confirm resolution of impaction and identify any underlying causes in stomach | ||
| − | + | At surgery, the impaction can be massaged and infused, most commonly via insertion of a needle adjacent to the greater curvature, followed by infusionof a balanced polyionic fluid such as saline. There is also a report including the details of a pony and a horse in which a gastrotomy was performed to removethe impacted stomach contents.5 However, there are major risks with this procedure, and infusion followed up by postoperative lavage by stomach tube isusually successful. (Bliks) | |
| − | + | Withthe horse in dorsal recumbency, the impacted stomach can be | |
| − | + | feltextending back to midway between the xiphisternum and the umbilicus and istherefore readily accessible via a midline | |
| − | + | celiotomy.As much as 30 - 40 kg have been removed via a gastrotomy but postoperativelynormal gastric motility was not | |
| − | + | restoredand impaction recurred (Edwards 1997). Reduction of stomach volume by partialresection of its flaccid wall was | |
| − | + | similarlyunsuccessful (Huskamp et al 2000). At post mortem examination there is markedtransmural hypertrophy of the | |
| − | + | non-glandularregion of the stomach particularly near the cardia, and large chronic ulcersalong the margo plicatus. The | |
| − | + | contentsof the body and fundic area are foetid and fermenting, and clearly have beenretained for several weeks or longer. | |
| − | + | Themost recently ingested food passes directly from the cardia to the pylorus. (Pylorus) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | Mair, T.S, Divers, T.J, Ducharme, N.G (2002) '''Manual of Equine Gastroenterology''', ''WB Saunders''. | |
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 8 August 2010
 |
This article is still under construction. |
Description
Gastric impaction can occur as a primary condition but is often diagnosed at surgery as a finding secondary to other disturbances in the intestinal tract. In some cases there be predisposing causes such as ulceration or fibrosis at the pylorus, whereas in other cases it may occur spontaneously.
stomach impaction is that it typically causes mild-to-moderate colic that does not resolve with routine medical treatment. (Bliks)
Stomach impaction is rare (Edwards)
Aetiology
Impaction of the stomach typically consists of excessive dry, fibrous ingesta, but may also be composed of ingested materials that form a mass, suchas persimmon seeds or mesquite beans.1-3 Other feeds that tend to swell after ingestion, including wheat, barley, and sugar beet pulp, may also cause impaction. Furthermore, dental disease may increase the likelihood of gastric impaction because of improper chewing of feed. (Bliks) Thecause of the impaction is often not known. However it may be the result of an intrinsic disturbance ofstomach function such as atony or defective secretion(Edwards)
Predisposing factors
- Ingestion of certain feedstuffs including beet pulp, bran, straw, wheat and barley - beet pulp and bran can become dessicated within the stomach and may not become rehydrated by water or gastric secretions
- Dental disorders - roughage may be incompletely masticated
- Feeding a horse that has signs of colic - there may be poor gastric emptying associated with generalised decreased gastrointestinal motility
secondary gastric impaction associated with ragwort poisoning(Milne)
Clinical signs
Abdominal discomfort If the signs are mild and resolve spontaneously or with analgesics, owners often inclined to feed the horse, worsening the impaction
Clinical signs of colic range from acute and severe to chronic and mild. For example, in one report on 4 horses with gastric impaction, colic was moderate or severe and of 8-12 hours’ duration,4 whereas in another report on a pony with gastric impaction, colic was chronic (7 days’ duration), associated with prolonged recumbency, anorexia, and lethargy.3 Additional signs may include dysphagia, dropping of feed, and bruxism.3,5
Inits acute form it is usually characterised by severe abdominal pain but somehorses may present with intermittent
Incontrast, chronic impaction of the stomach which appears to develop slowly overseveral weeks or even months has a poor prognosis verypoor prognosis (Edwards 1997, Huskamp, Scheidemann and Schusser 2000).Diagnosis is difficult in the early stages. Despitethe extreme gastric filling, affected horses show very little or no evidence ofovert abdominal pain. They continue toeat and defaecate but tendto show insidious weight loss. Salivation and bruxism may occur.(Edwards) Gastric impaction can result in acute or chronic signs of colic. Signs vary from anorexia and weight loss to those consistetn with severe abdominal pain. In severe cases pspontaenous reflux may occur, with gastric ocntentsvisible at the nares (Sanchez).
Diagnosis
Suspected if cannot pass NGT, with gastric distension the gastoroesophageal junction can become distorted making it difficult to pass an NGT If poorly macerated or digested feed material is recovered from the NGT when the horse has been starved for several hrs On rectal, spleen may be displaced caudally and medially (not specific) Endoscopy (not diagnostic for impaction and difficult to assess gastric distension) Rads may help, will show diaphragm displaced cranially
However, the diagnosis of stomach impaction is usually made at surgery on horses that have had uncontrollable colic or poor response to medicaltherapy. However, endoscopy will reveal gastric impaction, and may provide information on the specific nature of the impaction. Although this would nottypically be performed on an acute colic case, it would be indicated in a horse with chronic colic. (Bliks)
Alateral radiograph of the cranial abdomen showedthe stomach extending caudally from the diaphragm to the level of the 13th or14th intercostal space in several cases.The sonographic appearance is of a markedly enlarged gastric echo extendingover six or more intercostal spaces onthe left side of theabdomen. A marked increase in the thickness of the wall of the stomach may alsobe imaged. (Edwards)
Treatment
If suspected, horse should be tranferred with NGT in place to a faciltiy where surgery can be perfomed if necessary Medical tx can include gastric lavage to remove as much impacted material as possible - may need to be done repeatedly 100-200ml 8%DSS may facilitate hydration of dessicated ingesta IV fluid and anlagesics should also be given, although unlikely that IV fluids will resolve the impaction Gastric motility stimulants should be avoided if the extent of the impaction is unkown to prevent gastric rupture Those diagnosed at sx may be treated with bethanecol at 0.2mg/kg SC every 8hrs Medical treatment includes nasogastric intubation, and frequent attempts at softening the ingesta with water, followed by refluxing the fluid contents. (BLiks)
Surgery Direct infusion of balanced polyionic fluids into the impaction through the stomach wall Stomach massaged to break down impaction and facilitate movement of fluid into the ingesta Or fluid may be infused via NGT followed by massage of the stomach Post-op starve for 48-72hrs Gastroscopy indicated to confirm resolution of impaction and identify any underlying causes in stomach
At surgery, the impaction can be massaged and infused, most commonly via insertion of a needle adjacent to the greater curvature, followed by infusionof a balanced polyionic fluid such as saline. There is also a report including the details of a pony and a horse in which a gastrotomy was performed to removethe impacted stomach contents.5 However, there are major risks with this procedure, and infusion followed up by postoperative lavage by stomach tube isusually successful. (Bliks) Withthe horse in dorsal recumbency, the impacted stomach can be
feltextending back to midway between the xiphisternum and the umbilicus and istherefore readily accessible via a midline celiotomy.As much as 30 - 40 kg have been removed via a gastrotomy but postoperativelynormal gastric motility was not restoredand impaction recurred (Edwards 1997). Reduction of stomach volume by partialresection of its flaccid wall was similarlyunsuccessful (Huskamp et al 2000). At post mortem examination there is markedtransmural hypertrophy of the non-glandularregion of the stomach particularly near the cardia, and large chronic ulcersalong the margo plicatus. The contentsof the body and fundic area are foetid and fermenting, and clearly have beenretained for several weeks or longer. Themost recently ingested food passes directly from the cardia to the pylorus. (Pylorus)
References
Mair, T.S, Divers, T.J, Ducharme, N.G (2002) Manual of Equine Gastroenterology, WB Saunders.