Difference between revisions of "Lamb Dysentery"
(29 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{unfinished}} | |
− | + | Also known as: Clostridium perfringens type B Enterotoxaemia | |
− | + | ==Description== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | Enterotoxaemia due to ''Clostridium perfringens'' type B causes severe enteritis and dysentery with a high mortality in young lambs (lamb dysentery), but also | + | Lamb dysentery is a peracute and fatal enterotoxaemia of young lambs caused by the beta and epsilon toxins of ''Clostridium perfringens'' type B. ''C. perfringens'' is a large, gram positive, anaerobic bacillus that is ubiquitous in the environment and commensalises the gastrointestinal tract of most mammals<sup>ivis</sup>. Five genotypes of ''Clostridium perfringens'' exist, named A-E, and all genotypes produce potent exotoxins. There are 12 exotoxins in total, some of which are lethal and others which are of minor significance<sup>lewis</sup>. These are produced as pro-toxins, and are converted to their toxic froms by digestive enzymes. The enterotoxaemias are a group of diseases caused by proliferation of ''C. perfringens'' in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract and excessive production of exotoxin. |
+ | |||
+ | In healthy animals, there is a balance between multiplication of ''Clostridium perfringens'' and its passage in the faeces. This ensures that infection is maintained at a low level. However, ''C. perfringens'' is saccharolytic and is therefore able to multiply rapidly when large quantities of fermentable carbohydrate are introduced to the anaerobic conditions of the abomasum and small intestine, leading to build-up of exotoxin. Gut statis, for example due to insufficient dietray fibre or a high gastrointestinal parasite burden, can also contribute to the accumulation of toxins. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Enterotoxaemia due to ''Clostridium perfringens'' type B causes severe enteritis and dysentery with a high mortality in young lambs (lamb dysentery), but also in calves, pigs, and foals. The β toxin it produces is highly necrotising and is responsible for severe intestinal damage. Ε toxin also plays a part in pathogenesis. The incidence of lamb dysentery declined over the past 20 years or so, due to the widespread use of clostridial vaccins<sup>sargison</sup>, but the condition is now becoming a problem again as complacency reduces flocks vaccinating for the disease. Outbreaks of lamb dysentery typically occur during cold, wet lambing periods when lambing ewes are confined to small areas of shelter which rapidly become unhygienic. Most cases are seen in stronger, single lambs<sup>sargison</sup>, because these animals consume the largest quantities of milk which functions as a growth medium for ''C. perfringens''. | ||
==Signalment== | ==Signalment== | ||
− | Affected animals are unvaccinated lambs of less than two | + | |
+ | Affected animals are unvaccinated lambs of less than two weeks old. The condition is most common in neonates between one and three days of age, and typically affects well-fed singletons<sup>sargison</sup>. | ||
==Diagnosis== | ==Diagnosis== | ||
− | |||
− | === | + | A provisional diagnosis of lamb dysentery can be made on the basis of a history of sudden deaths in well-grown, unvaccinated lambs. This is supported by post-mortem findings, and laboratory testing may also be useful. |
− | Lamb dysentery often presents as sudden death of lambs less than 2-3 weeks old<sup> | + | |
+ | ===Clincal Signs=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lamb dysentery often presents as sudden death of lambs less than 2-3 weeks old<sup>sargison, lewis, merk, songer</sup>. When clinical signs are seen, these include cessation of suckling, depression and recumbency<sup>merck</sup>. Animals suffer acute abdominal pain, and semi-fluid blood-stained faeces may be passed<sup>sargison, leis merck, sanger</sup>. However, the rapid course of disease means that faeces are often observed to be normal. In 2-3 week old lambs, lamb dysentery may present with non-specific neurological signs<sup>sargison</sup>. | ||
===Laboratory Tests=== | ===Laboratory Tests=== | ||
− | |||
− | Intestinal smears and scrapings readily reveal gram-positive rods<sup> | + | Intestinal contents or pertioneal fluid may be collected post-mortem and submitted for an ELISA test to identify clostridial exotoxins. A positive result supports a diagnosis of enterotoxaemia but does not confirm it: animals with immunity to ''Clostridium perfringens'' may have high concentrations of toxin with suffering from its effects. |
+ | |||
+ | Intestinal smears and scrapings readily reveal gram-positive rods<sup>sargison, watt</sup>. Culture of intestinal contents can yield almost pure growths of ''C. perfringens''<sup>watt</sup>, but this is again supportive rather than diagnostic<sup>sargison</sup>. | ||
===Pathology=== | ===Pathology=== | ||
− | |||
− | + | Hemorrhagic enteritis with ulceration of the mucosa is the major lesion in all species. Grossly, the affected portion of the intestine is deep blue-purple and appears at first glance to be an infarction associated with mesenteric torsion. Smears of intestinal contents can be examined for large numbers of gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria, and filtrates made for detection of toxin and subsequent identification by neutralization with specific antiserum | |
− | + | watt: Diagnosis on post mortem examination is | |
− | + | usually obx ious with areas of the small intestine markedly | |
+ | hy peraemic and with characteristic ulceration of the mucosa. | ||
+ | (Disease presentinig similar lesions has been described involving | ||
+ | Cl wet1ihil type C.) | ||
− | + | sargison At postmortem examination. localised | |
+ | areaLs ot the intestinies appear dark red and distended, | ||
+ | with ulceration otl the mucosa and serous, blood-stained | ||
+ | peritoneal fluid. The liver may be pale and friable and | ||
+ | the kidnieys enlarged. Numerous Gram-positixe rods are | ||
+ | present in smears from intestinal scrapings. | ||
− | + | ==Treatment== | |
− | + | Presentation of lamb dysentery is usually peracute, with sudden deaths occuring before treatment can be implemented. Even if animals are found prior to death, treatment is usually unrewarding as organs are irreversibly damaged by toxins by the time signs present<sup>lewis</sup>. Instead, a definitive diagnosis should be pursued before great losses occur, and the farmer should be encouraged to submit the carcase for further investigations. | |
− | |||
+ | As treatment is so ineffective, much emphasis is put on to the control of lamb dysentery. Vaccination in the face of an outbreak has been shown to be effective<sup>west</sup>, and specific hyperimmune serum can also be administered<sup>Merck, watt</sup>. Oral antibiotics may be given<sup>merck</sup> but are regarded as a less appropriate therepautic. Management measures such as removing the flock from a particular pasture or reducing concentrate feeding may be implemented in other clostridial diseases but are of no benefit in lamb dysentery: over-ingestion of the dam's milk combined with poor hygiene are responsible for this disease. Therefore, | ||
+ | sufficient supervision should be given at lambing time to ensure adequate intakes of colostrium and the maintenance of good hygiene. | ||
− | + | Lamb dysentery can be controlled through vaccination against clostridial diseases. Before the advent of modern vaccines, | |
− | + | losses from clostridial diseases could | |
− | + | be cata-strophic, on occasion running | |
+ | at over 30 per cent. By the mid-1970s, | ||
+ | efficient multicomponent vaccines | ||
+ | were widely available and in the mid- | ||
+ | 1980s the clostridial components were | ||
+ | combined with multicomponent pasteurella | ||
+ | antigens. Clostridial vaccines | ||
+ | are, except for the C chauvoei component, | ||
+ | directed at the toxins produced | ||
+ | by the various pathogenic members of | ||
+ | the clostridial family. Referred to as | ||
+ | toxoids, they are inactivated and | ||
+ | require an adjuvant for better stimulation | ||
+ | of the immune system. | ||
+ | Whether a straight clostridial vaccine | ||
+ | or a combined vaccine is used, the principles | ||
+ | underlying efficacious vaccination | ||
+ | programmes are identical. For | ||
+ | effective protection of sheep, of whatever | ||
+ | age, a primary course of two | ||
+ | doses, administered four to six weeks | ||
+ | apart, is required. The first dose can be | ||
+ | considered a sensitising dose and, the | ||
+ | second, the confirming dose. Immunity | ||
+ | wanes over a period of a year and, | ||
+ | consequently, booster doses are | ||
+ | required annually.Before ewes enter the breeding flock, they should be given two vaccinations separated by an interval of 4-6 weeks. An annual booster should be given about six weeks before lambing to afford passive protection to lambs until around sixteen weeks of age. Lambs born to unvaccinated ewes should themselves be vaccinated at between 3 and 12 weeks old, with a second injection given at least four weeks later. Good husbandry is also critical to the control of lamb dysentery. | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
− | *[http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp?cfile=htm/bc/50713.htm The Merck Veterinary Manual: Enterotoxemia Caused by | + | *[http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp?cfile=htm/bc/50713.htm The Merck Veterinary Manual: Enterotoxemia Caused by Clostridium perfringens Types B and C] |
− | |||
*[http://www.noah.co.uk/issues/briefingdoc/22-vaccfarmanimals.htm NOAH: Vaccination of farm animals] | *[http://www.noah.co.uk/issues/briefingdoc/22-vaccfarmanimals.htm NOAH: Vaccination of farm animals] | ||
*[http://www.clostridia.net/Cperfringens.htm Clostridia.net - ''Clostridium perfringens''] | *[http://www.clostridia.net/Cperfringens.htm Clostridia.net - ''Clostridium perfringens''] | ||
Line 51: | Line 90: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
− | #Van Metre (2006) Clostridial Infections of the Ruminant GI Tract. ''Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference 2006'' | + | #Merck & Co (2008) '''The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition)''', ''Merial''. |
+ | #The Center for Food Security and Public Health, Iowa State University (2004) [http://www.ivis.org/advances/Disease_Factsheets/epsilon_toxin_clostridium.pdf Animal Disease Factsheet: Epsilon toxin of Clostridium Perfringens.] | ||
+ | #Songer, J G (1998) Clostridial diseases of small ruminants. ''Veterinary Research'', '''29''', 219-232. | ||
+ | #Van Metre (2006) Clostridial Infections of the Ruminant GI Tract. ''Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference 2006'' | ||
#Lewis, C (1998) Aspects of clostridial disease in sheep. ''In Practice'', '''20(9)''', 494-499. | #Lewis, C (1998) Aspects of clostridial disease in sheep. ''In Practice'', '''20(9)''', 494-499. | ||
#Sargison, N (2004) Differential diagnosis of diarrhoea in lambs. ''In Practice'', '''26(1)''', 20-27. | #Sargison, N (2004) Differential diagnosis of diarrhoea in lambs. ''In Practice'', '''26(1)''', 20-27. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
#Watt, A (1980) Neonatal losses in lambs. ''In Practice'', '''2(2)''', 5-9. | #Watt, A (1980) Neonatal losses in lambs. ''In Practice'', '''2(2)''', 5-9. | ||
− | + | #Lewis, C (2000) Vaccination of sheep: an update. ''In Practice'', ''22(1)'', 34-39. | |
− | |||
− | #Lewis, C (2000) Vaccination of sheep: an update. ''In Practice'', | ||
− | |||
− | + | [[Category:Enteritis,_Bacterial]][[Category:Enteritis,_Fibrinous/Haemorrhagic]] [[Category: WikiClinical Ovine]] | |
− | [[Category:Enteritis,_Bacterial]][[Category:Enteritis,_Fibrinous/Haemorrhagic]] [[Category: | + | [[Category:To_Do_-_Lizzie]] |
− | [[Category: |
Revision as of 18:50, 24 August 2010
This article is still under construction. |
Also known as: Clostridium perfringens type B Enterotoxaemia
Description
Lamb dysentery is a peracute and fatal enterotoxaemia of young lambs caused by the beta and epsilon toxins of Clostridium perfringens type B. C. perfringens is a large, gram positive, anaerobic bacillus that is ubiquitous in the environment and commensalises the gastrointestinal tract of most mammalsivis. Five genotypes of Clostridium perfringens exist, named A-E, and all genotypes produce potent exotoxins. There are 12 exotoxins in total, some of which are lethal and others which are of minor significancelewis. These are produced as pro-toxins, and are converted to their toxic froms by digestive enzymes. The enterotoxaemias are a group of diseases caused by proliferation of C. perfringens in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract and excessive production of exotoxin.
In healthy animals, there is a balance between multiplication of Clostridium perfringens and its passage in the faeces. This ensures that infection is maintained at a low level. However, C. perfringens is saccharolytic and is therefore able to multiply rapidly when large quantities of fermentable carbohydrate are introduced to the anaerobic conditions of the abomasum and small intestine, leading to build-up of exotoxin. Gut statis, for example due to insufficient dietray fibre or a high gastrointestinal parasite burden, can also contribute to the accumulation of toxins.
Enterotoxaemia due to Clostridium perfringens type B causes severe enteritis and dysentery with a high mortality in young lambs (lamb dysentery), but also in calves, pigs, and foals. The β toxin it produces is highly necrotising and is responsible for severe intestinal damage. Ε toxin also plays a part in pathogenesis. The incidence of lamb dysentery declined over the past 20 years or so, due to the widespread use of clostridial vaccinssargison, but the condition is now becoming a problem again as complacency reduces flocks vaccinating for the disease. Outbreaks of lamb dysentery typically occur during cold, wet lambing periods when lambing ewes are confined to small areas of shelter which rapidly become unhygienic. Most cases are seen in stronger, single lambssargison, because these animals consume the largest quantities of milk which functions as a growth medium for C. perfringens.
Signalment
Affected animals are unvaccinated lambs of less than two weeks old. The condition is most common in neonates between one and three days of age, and typically affects well-fed singletonssargison.
Diagnosis
A provisional diagnosis of lamb dysentery can be made on the basis of a history of sudden deaths in well-grown, unvaccinated lambs. This is supported by post-mortem findings, and laboratory testing may also be useful.
Clincal Signs
Lamb dysentery often presents as sudden death of lambs less than 2-3 weeks oldsargison, lewis, merk, songer. When clinical signs are seen, these include cessation of suckling, depression and recumbencymerck. Animals suffer acute abdominal pain, and semi-fluid blood-stained faeces may be passedsargison, leis merck, sanger. However, the rapid course of disease means that faeces are often observed to be normal. In 2-3 week old lambs, lamb dysentery may present with non-specific neurological signssargison.
Laboratory Tests
Intestinal contents or pertioneal fluid may be collected post-mortem and submitted for an ELISA test to identify clostridial exotoxins. A positive result supports a diagnosis of enterotoxaemia but does not confirm it: animals with immunity to Clostridium perfringens may have high concentrations of toxin with suffering from its effects.
Intestinal smears and scrapings readily reveal gram-positive rodssargison, watt. Culture of intestinal contents can yield almost pure growths of C. perfringenswatt, but this is again supportive rather than diagnosticsargison.
Pathology
Hemorrhagic enteritis with ulceration of the mucosa is the major lesion in all species. Grossly, the affected portion of the intestine is deep blue-purple and appears at first glance to be an infarction associated with mesenteric torsion. Smears of intestinal contents can be examined for large numbers of gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria, and filtrates made for detection of toxin and subsequent identification by neutralization with specific antiserum
watt: Diagnosis on post mortem examination is usually obx ious with areas of the small intestine markedly hy peraemic and with characteristic ulceration of the mucosa. (Disease presentinig similar lesions has been described involving Cl wet1ihil type C.)
sargison At postmortem examination. localised areaLs ot the intestinies appear dark red and distended, with ulceration otl the mucosa and serous, blood-stained peritoneal fluid. The liver may be pale and friable and the kidnieys enlarged. Numerous Gram-positixe rods are present in smears from intestinal scrapings.
Treatment
Presentation of lamb dysentery is usually peracute, with sudden deaths occuring before treatment can be implemented. Even if animals are found prior to death, treatment is usually unrewarding as organs are irreversibly damaged by toxins by the time signs presentlewis. Instead, a definitive diagnosis should be pursued before great losses occur, and the farmer should be encouraged to submit the carcase for further investigations.
As treatment is so ineffective, much emphasis is put on to the control of lamb dysentery. Vaccination in the face of an outbreak has been shown to be effectivewest, and specific hyperimmune serum can also be administeredMerck, watt. Oral antibiotics may be givenmerck but are regarded as a less appropriate therepautic. Management measures such as removing the flock from a particular pasture or reducing concentrate feeding may be implemented in other clostridial diseases but are of no benefit in lamb dysentery: over-ingestion of the dam's milk combined with poor hygiene are responsible for this disease. Therefore, sufficient supervision should be given at lambing time to ensure adequate intakes of colostrium and the maintenance of good hygiene.
Lamb dysentery can be controlled through vaccination against clostridial diseases. Before the advent of modern vaccines, losses from clostridial diseases could be cata-strophic, on occasion running at over 30 per cent. By the mid-1970s, efficient multicomponent vaccines were widely available and in the mid- 1980s the clostridial components were combined with multicomponent pasteurella antigens. Clostridial vaccines are, except for the C chauvoei component, directed at the toxins produced by the various pathogenic members of the clostridial family. Referred to as toxoids, they are inactivated and require an adjuvant for better stimulation of the immune system. Whether a straight clostridial vaccine or a combined vaccine is used, the principles underlying efficacious vaccination programmes are identical. For effective protection of sheep, of whatever age, a primary course of two doses, administered four to six weeks apart, is required. The first dose can be considered a sensitising dose and, the second, the confirming dose. Immunity wanes over a period of a year and, consequently, booster doses are required annually.Before ewes enter the breeding flock, they should be given two vaccinations separated by an interval of 4-6 weeks. An annual booster should be given about six weeks before lambing to afford passive protection to lambs until around sixteen weeks of age. Lambs born to unvaccinated ewes should themselves be vaccinated at between 3 and 12 weeks old, with a second injection given at least four weeks later. Good husbandry is also critical to the control of lamb dysentery.
Links
- The Merck Veterinary Manual: Enterotoxemia Caused by Clostridium perfringens Types B and C
- NOAH: Vaccination of farm animals
- Clostridia.net - Clostridium perfringens
References
- Merck & Co (2008) The Merck Veterinary Manual (Eighth Edition), Merial.
- The Center for Food Security and Public Health, Iowa State University (2004) Animal Disease Factsheet: Epsilon toxin of Clostridium Perfringens.
- Songer, J G (1998) Clostridial diseases of small ruminants. Veterinary Research, 29, 219-232.
- Van Metre (2006) Clostridial Infections of the Ruminant GI Tract. Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference 2006
- Lewis, C (1998) Aspects of clostridial disease in sheep. In Practice, 20(9), 494-499.
- Sargison, N (2004) Differential diagnosis of diarrhoea in lambs. In Practice, 26(1), 20-27.
- Watt, A (1980) Neonatal losses in lambs. In Practice, 2(2), 5-9.
- Lewis, C (2000) Vaccination of sheep: an update. In Practice, 22(1), 34-39.