| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{review}} | | {{review}} |
| | | | |
| | + | In clinical practice healing can be achieved in one of three ways: |
| | + | * Primary or first intention healing. |
| | + | * Secondary or second intention healing. |
| | + | * Delayed primary healing. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Primary or first intention healing== |
| | + | |
| | + | This is the mechanism that occurs when the edges of a wound can be closely |
| | + | apposed. Most surgical wounds rely upon this mechanism. In a non-infected |
| | + | surgical wound, healing is reliably accomplished in a predictably short time |
| | + | (usually 7 to 14 days). |
| | + | |
| | + | Elective surgical wounds are probably the current ‘gold standard’ of |
| | + | wound management, but there are major differences between surgical |
| | + | wounds and accidental injuries (see Table 1 and Table 2 below) and so there are |
| | + | almost inevitable differences in healing between the surgical situation and |
| | + | the accidental wound. |
| | + | [[Image:Wounds table.jpg|center|thumb|450px|<small><center>(Image courtesy of [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary])</center></small>]] |
| | + | [[Image:Table healing.jpg|center|thumb|450px|<small><center>(Image courtesy of [http://drupal.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk The Donkey Sanctuary])</center></small>]] |
| | + | |
| | + | In primary wound healing, the various tissue structures involved are |
| | + | managed by suturing to restore very close normal anatomical relations. The |
| | + | underlying tissues are closed carefully to minimize dead space, provide good |
| | + | support for the skin wound itself and to restore function as far as possible. |
| | + | Although in most cases this will involve closure of the wound by sutures |
| | + | or staples, this is not a prerequisite. Close apposition of the margins of the |
| | + | wound using adhesive tabs or even simply by bandaging in a suitable fashion |
| | + | may have the same effect and may indeed be considered to be advantageous |
| | + | in that there is no foreign matter in the wound. Minimal granulation tissue |
| | + | formation and epithelial migration are required and so the wound heals |
| | + | rapidly. Usually within seven to ten days the wound margin is sufficiently |
| | + | strong to permit removal of skin sutures. |
| | + | |
| | + | Few accidental/ traumatic wounds are amenable to this approach because |
| | + | there are almost always some complicating factors. Where it is possible |
| | + | however to create a ‘surgical’ situation from a traumatic injury, wounds will |
| | + | heal with an excellent result both functionally and cosmetically. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Secondary or second intention healing== |
| | + | |
| | + | Second intention healing is the natural way for a wound to heal. Wounds |
| | + | too extensive or contaminated to suture, or those in which primary closure |
| | + | has failed, must heal in this way. |
| | + | |
| | + | In second intention healing, a '''healthy bed of granulation tissue is |
| | + | required before epithelialisation can proceed'''. The quality of the granulation |
| | + | tissue bed and the anatomical site has a strong influence on the rate of |
| | + | healing of the wound. Because there is a necessary delay in the development |
| | + | of the granulation tissue bed, there is an inevitable delay in healing. |
| | + | |
| | + | Major factors in the process of second intention healing are the size of |
| | + | the wound, the anatomical location and the extent of '''complicating factors''': |
| | + | * Over 70% of donkey wounds are complicated by failure to heal and chronic inflammation |
| | + | * Second intention healing relies upon the inflammatory response; the longer the wound takes to heal, the greater will be the scar and the possible cosmetic and functional deficits |
| | + | * The anticipated problems associated with second intention healing may encourage clinicians to try to close wounds by primary union, although this can be ill-advised |
| | + | |
| | + | <u>Most traumatic wounds create circumstances that preclude primary |
| | + | closure</u> and so second intention healing is a major clinical aspect of wound |
| | + | management in donkeys. Factors that disturb normal corrective processes |
| | + | inevitably complicate and delay wound healing. Early recognition of healing |
| | + | difficulties allows prompt correction; ideally factors that will result in |
| | + | non-healing should be recognized pre-emptively at the time of wounding, |
| | + | but inevitably some will not be apparent until later and possibly when the |
| | + | wound has failed to heal. |
| | + | |
| | + | The owner of a donkey with one or more of these factors can be given |
| | + | rational advice on the likely prognosis and the time-scale for healing. Most |
| | + | non-healing wounds are preventable by suitable management in the early |
| | + | stages after injury and others are understandable or predictable. Failure |
| | + | to recognize potential reasons for failure of healing in a fresh wound, or |
| | + | delayed presentation, mean that the wound will become chronically inflamed |
| | + | and so the healing process will be unnecessarily prolonged. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Delayed primary healing== |
| | + | |
| | + | This is a useful procedure that combines the early stages of second intention |
| | + | healing with a primary intention healing after a few days. It is applicable to |
| | + | a few wounds but it is a very rewarding process. If closure is delayed for |
| | + | 72 to 96 hours, only a minimal risk of infection exists. The method allows |
| | + | contaminated wounds in which immediate closure may lead to infection to |
| | + | heal faster than would be the case for second intention healing. |
| | + | The wound is '''initially cleaned and debrided, but is not closed'''. After a |
| | + | variable time (usually two to four days), the wound is '''surgically debrided to |
| | + | remove any demarcated tissues and closed by suture as for first intention''' |
| | + | healing. There is an inevitable delay in the healing process but, where it |
| | + | is applicable, the healing time is usually shorter than second intention |
| | + | healing. |
| | + | |
| | + | The '''clinical advantages'' of delayed primary healing are considerable: |
| | + | * The wound can be assessed for causes of failure of healing at various stages, allowing the best time for closure to be chosen |
| | + | * Acute inflammatory responses and natural debridement can take place before it is ‘driven’ towards healing without the development of a difficult and prolonged chronic inflammatory process |
| | + | |
| | + | The '''disadvantages''' include the need for repeated procedures and an inevitable increase in scarring when compared to first intention healing, even when the time delay is relatively insignificant. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==References== |
| | + | |
| | + | * Knottenbelt, D. (2008) The principles and practice of wound mamagement In Svendsen, E.D., Duncan, J. and Hadrill, D. (2008) ''The Professional Handbook of the Donkey'', 4th edition, Whittet Books, Chapter 9 |
| | | | |
| | | | |