Difference between revisions of "Wound Types - Donkey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{review}} | ||
Although wounds are given specific classifications, most have properties of | Although wounds are given specific classifications, most have properties of | ||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
|linkpage =Wound Management - Donkey | |linkpage =Wound Management - Donkey | ||
|linktext =Wound Management - Donkey | |linktext =Wound Management - Donkey | ||
| + | |rspace={{Donkey}} | ||
|pagetype=Donkey | |pagetype=Donkey | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 20 February 2010
 |
This article has been peer reviewed but is awaiting expert review. If you would like to help with this, please see more information about expert reviewing. |
Although wounds are given specific classifications, most have properties of several types. Indeed, there are seldom any classical wounds that affect nothing but the skin and are without any significant anatomical complications, apart from those afflicted in the course of elective or other surgical procedures.
References
- Knottenbelt, D. (2008) The principles and practice of wound mamagement In Svendsen, E.D., Duncan, J. and Hadrill, D. (2008) The Professional Handbook of the Donkey, 4th edition, Whittet Books, Chapter 9
|
